These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31458673)

  • 21. Prediction of the binding free energies of new TIBO-like HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors using a combination of PROFEC, PB/SA, CMC/MD, and free energy calculations.
    Eriksson MA; Pitera J; Kollman PA
    J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(5):868-81. PubMed ID: 10072684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Binding free energy calculation with QM/MM hybrid methods for Abl-Kinase inhibitor.
    Dubey KD; Ojha RP
    J Biol Phys; 2011 Jan; 37(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 22210962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Statistical Analysis on the Performance of Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area versus Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations: Bromodomains as a Case Study.
    Aldeghi M; Bodkin MJ; Knapp S; Biggin PC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Sep; 57(9):2203-2221. PubMed ID: 28786670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Explicitly solvated ligand contribution to continuum solvation models for binding free energies: selectivity of theophylline binding to an RNA aptamer.
    Freedman H; Huynh LP; Le L; Cheatham TE; Tuszynski JA; Truong TN
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Feb; 114(6):2227-37. PubMed ID: 20099932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MM/PB(GB)SA benchmarks on soluble proteins and membrane proteins.
    Wang S; Sun X; Cui W; Yuan S
    Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():1018351. PubMed ID: 36532746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improving the scoring of protein-ligand binding affinity by including the effects of structural water and electronic polarization.
    Liu J; He X; Zhang JZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 23651068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A QM protein-ligand investigation of antipsychotic drugs with the dopamine D2 Receptor (D2R).
    Ekhteiari Salmas R; Serhat Is Y; Durdagi S; Stein M; Yurtsever M
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2018 Aug; 36(10):2668-2677. PubMed ID: 28805144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Binding affinities by alchemical perturbation using QM/MM with a large QM system and polarizable MM model.
    Genheden S; Ryde U; Söderhjelm P
    J Comput Chem; 2015 Oct; 36(28):2114-24. PubMed ID: 26280564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies.
    Genheden S; Ryde U
    Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. MM-GB/SA rescoring of docking poses in structure-based lead optimization.
    Guimarães CR; Cardozo M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):958-70. PubMed ID: 18422307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Physics-based scoring of protein-ligand interactions: explicit polarizability, quantum mechanics and free energies.
    Bryce RA
    Future Med Chem; 2011 Apr; 3(6):683-98. PubMed ID: 21554075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Calculation of relative binding free energy differences for fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase inhibitors using the thermodynamic cycle perturbation approach.
    Reddy MR; Erion MD
    J Am Chem Soc; 2001 Jul; 123(26):6246-52. PubMed ID: 11427047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.
    He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. QM/MM as a tool in fragment based drug discovery. A cross-docking, rescoring study of kinase inhibitors.
    Gleeson MP; Gleeson D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1437-48. PubMed ID: 19459698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rapid estimation of relative protein-ligand binding affinities using a high-throughput version of MM-PBSA.
    Brown SP; Muchmore SW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(4):1493-503. PubMed ID: 17518461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Explicit Drug Re-positioning: Predicting Novel Drug-Target Interactions of the Shelved Molecules with QM/MM Based Approaches.
    Omer A; Suryanarayanan V; Selvaraj C; Singh SK; Singh P
    Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol; 2015; 100():89-112. PubMed ID: 26415842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. QM/MM-PB/SA scoring of the interaction strength between Akt kinase and apigenin analogues.
    Lu J; Zhang Z; Ni Z; Shen H; Tu Z; Liu H; Lu R
    Comput Biol Chem; 2014 Oct; 52():25-33. PubMed ID: 25179857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.