These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31459140)
1. Evidence of Genetic Fecal Marker Interactions between Water Column and Periphyton in Artificial Streams. Li X; Peed L; Sivaganesan M; Kelty CA; Nietch C; Shanks OC ACS Omega; 2018 Aug; 3(8):10107-10113. PubMed ID: 31459140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors affecting the presence of human-associated and fecal indicator real-time quantitative PCR genetic markers in urban-impacted recreational beaches. Molina M; Hunter S; Cyterski M; Peed LA; Kelty CA; Sivaganesan M; Mooney T; Prieto L; Shanks OC Water Res; 2014 Nov; 64():196-208. PubMed ID: 25061692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distribution of genetic markers of fecal pollution on a freshwater sandy shoreline in proximity to wastewater effluent. Eichmiller JJ; Hicks RE; Sadowsky MJ Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Apr; 47(7):3395-402. PubMed ID: 23473470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of chemical, molecular, and traditional markers of fecal contamination in an effluent dominated urban stream. Litton RM; Ahn JH; Sercu B; Holden PA; Sedlak DL; Grant SB Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Oct; 44(19):7369-75. PubMed ID: 20839837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age-related shifts in the density and distribution of genetic marker water quality indicators in cow and calf feces. Shanks OC; Kelty CA; Peed L; Sivaganesan M; Mooney T; Jenkins M Appl Environ Microbiol; 2014 Mar; 80(5):1588-94. PubMed ID: 24362434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distributions of Fecal Markers in Wastewater from Different Climatic Zones for Human Fecal Pollution Tracking in Australian Surface Waters. Ahmed W; Sidhu JPS; Smith K; Beale DJ; Gyawali P; Toze S Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Feb; 82(4):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 26682850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene markers as a complementary tool for detecting fecal pollution in a prairie watershed. Fremaux B; Gritzfeld J; Boa T; Yost CK Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4838-49. PubMed ID: 19604534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wastewater microorganisms impact microbial diversity and important ecological functions of stream periphyton. Carles L; Wullschleger S; Joss A; Eggen RIL; Schirmer K; Schuwirth N; Stamm C; Tlili A Water Res; 2022 Oct; 225():119119. PubMed ID: 36170769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources. Rothenheber D; Jones S Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 84(17):. PubMed ID: 30006393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of sources and loadings of fecal pollutants using microbial source tracking assays in urban and rural areas of the Grand River Watershed, Southwestern Ontario. Lee DY; Lee H; Trevors JT; Weir SC; Thomas JL; Habash M Water Res; 2014 Apr; 53():123-31. PubMed ID: 24509346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of Bacteroidales quantitative PCR assays targeting human and animal fecal contamination in the public and domestic domains in India. Odagiri M; Schriewer A; Hanley K; Wuertz S; Misra PR; Panigrahi P; Jenkins MW Sci Total Environ; 2015 Jan; 502():462-70. PubMed ID: 25285421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suspended particle adhesion on aquatic plant surfaces: implications for 137Cs and 133Cs uptake rates and water-to-plant concentration ratios. Sansone U; Belli M; Jeran Z; Kanivets VV; Radojko J; Riccardi M; Voitsekhovitch OV J Environ Radioact; 2002; 59(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 11954717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying fecal sources in a selected catchment reach using multiple source-tracking tools. Vogel JR; Stoeckel DM; Lamendella R; Zelt RB; Santo Domingo JW; Walker SR; Oerther DB J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(3):718-29. PubMed ID: 17412907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of freshwater sediment characteristics on the persistence of fecal indicator bacteria and genetic markers within a Southern California watershed. Zimmer-Faust AG; Thulsiraj V; Marambio-Jones C; Cao Y; Griffith JF; Holden PA; Jay JA Water Res; 2017 Aug; 119():1-11. PubMed ID: 28433878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Growth and antibiotic resistance acquisition of Escherichia coli in a river that receives treated sewage effluent. Suzuki Y; Hashimoto R; Xie H; Nishimura E; Nishiyama M; Nukazawa K; Ishii S Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 690():696-704. PubMed ID: 31301509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Isolating the impact of septic systems on fecal pollution in streams of suburban watersheds in Georgia, United States. Sowah RA; Habteselassie MY; Radcliffe DE; Bauske E; Risse M Water Res; 2017 Jan; 108():330-338. PubMed ID: 27847149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of molecular source tracking and mass balance approach to identify potential sources of fecal indicator bacteria in a tropical river. Yamahara KM; Keymer DP; Layton BA; Walters SP; Thompson RS; Rosener M; Boehm AB PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232054. PubMed ID: 32352994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Periphyton collectors as a tool to measure environmental performance of ocean outlets. Lemmens S Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):125-31. PubMed ID: 12793671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]