These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31460642)
1. [Trend and characteristics of manuscripts received and rejected in the Peruvian Journal of Experimental Medicine and Public Health between 2011 and 2017]. Arroyo-Hernández H; Huarez B Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica; 2019; 36(2):281-287. PubMed ID: 31460642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection. Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fate of manuscripts rejected from the Red Journal. Holliday EB; Yang G; Jagsi R; Hoffman KE; Bennett KE; Grace C; Zietman AL Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 25835616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts. Enquselassie F Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals. Lee KP; Boyd EA; Holroyd-Leduc JM; Bacchetti P; Bero LA Med J Aust; 2006 Jun; 184(12):621-6. PubMed ID: 16803442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Bibliometric analysis of papers published in revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud pública, 2010-2017]. Romaní F; Cabezas C Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica; 2018; 35(4):620-629. PubMed ID: 30726417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition. Cejas C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012. Lamb CR; Adams CA Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology. Hall SA; Wilcox AJ Epidemiology; 2007 Mar; 18(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 17301708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The fate of triaged and rejected manuscripts. Zoccali C; Amodeo D; Argiles A; Arici M; D'arrigo G; Evenepoel P; Fliser D; Fox J; Gesualdo L; Jadoul M; Ketteler M; Malyszko J; Massy Z; Mayer G; Ortiz A; Sever M; Vanholder R; Vinck C; Wanner C; Więcek A Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Dec; 30(12):1947-50. PubMed ID: 26597920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Publishers: Save Authors' Time. Moustafa K Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):815-816. PubMed ID: 28155095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts. Garfunkel JM; Lawson EE; Hamrick HJ; Ulshen MH JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1376-8. PubMed ID: 2304217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What happens to medical articles submitted in Spanish that are not accepted for publication? Matías-Guiu JA; García-Ramos R; Castellanos M; Martínez-Vila E; Matías-Guiu J Neurologia; 2013 May; 28(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 22795919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003. Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between a reviewer's recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics. Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Odibo AO; Chauhan SP; Smulian JC; Oyelese Y Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):703.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24983685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency and Factors Associated With Honorary Authorship in Indian Biomedical Journals: Analysis of Papers Published From 2012 to 2013. Shah A; Rajasekaran S; Bhat A; Solomon JM J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Apr; 13(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 29345178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship. Slone RM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):571-9. PubMed ID: 8751654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Journal response types and times: the outcomes of manuscripts finalised for submission by the University of the Free State School of Medicine medical editor, South Africa. Joubert G; Mulder T; Steinberg WJ; Botes J Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 36():212. PubMed ID: 32963678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The peer review process III: when the decision is made. Riss P Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jul; 23(7):811-2. PubMed ID: 21901436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of submissions, editorial and peer-review process, and outcome of manuscripts submitted to the Gupta V; Bhatia R; Pathak M; Ramam M Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2020; 86(5):519-525. PubMed ID: 32167071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]