These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31460806)

  • 1. The P300 auditory event-related potential as a method to assess the benefit of contralateral hearing aid use in bimodal listeners: a proof-of-concept.
    Van Yper LN; Dhooge IJM; Vermeire K; De Vel EFJ; Beynon AJ
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 31460806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid: Objective Measures of Binaural Benefit.
    Balkenhol T; Wallhäusser-Franke E; Rotter N; Servais JJ
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():586119. PubMed ID: 33381008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural Correlates of Selective Attention With Hearing Aid Use Followed by ReadMyQuips Auditory Training Program.
    Rao A; Rishiq D; Yu L; Zhang Y; Abrams H
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 27556531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing.
    Chang YP; Chang RY; Lin CY; Luo X
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 26752089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the bimodal benefit in a large cohort of cochlear implant subjects using a contralateral hearing aid.
    Illg A; Bojanowicz M; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T; Büchner A
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Oct; 35(9):e240-4. PubMed ID: 25058838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparisons of P300s from standard oddball and omitted paradigms: implications to exogenous/endogenous contributions.
    McCullagh J; Weihing J; Musiek F
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Mar; 20(3):187-95; quiz 219. PubMed ID: 19927689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
    Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Nash JJ; Runge CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of cochlear implant benefit with auditory cortical evoked potentials.
    Beynon AJ; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):429-35. PubMed ID: 12403611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear implant combined with a linear frequency transposing hearing aid.
    Hua H; Johansson B; Jönsson R; Magnusson L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):722-32. PubMed ID: 23072964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of complexity of visual distracters on attention and information processing speed reflected in auditory p300.
    Wilson MJ; Harkrider AW; King KA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):480-8. PubMed ID: 22343547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech-evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Groenen PA; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11330917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The P300 component wave reveals differences in subclinical anxious-depressive states during bimodal oddball tasks: An effect of stimulus congruence.
    Delle-Vigne D; Kornreich C; Verbanck P; Campanella S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Nov; 126(11):2108-23. PubMed ID: 25703941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bimodal Hearing or Bilateral Cochlear Implants? Ask the Patient.
    Gifford RH; Dorman MF
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):501-516. PubMed ID: 30285977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception.
    Veugen LCE; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; van Opstal AJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Sep; 18(5):266-277. PubMed ID: 28726592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.