251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31461029)
1. Outcomes and Complications of Pediatric Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review.
Abu-Ghname A; Banuelos J; Oliver JD; Vyas K; Daniels D; Sharaf B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Sep; 144(3):433e-443e. PubMed ID: 31461029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-Term Complications of Cranioplasty Using Stored Autologous Bone Graft, Three-Dimensional Polymethyl Methacrylate, or Titanium Mesh After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Single-Center Experience After 596 Procedures.
Yeap MC; Tu PH; Liu ZH; Hsieh PC; Liu YT; Lee CY; Lai HY; Chen CT; Huang YC; Wei KC; Wu CT; Chen CC
World Neurosurg; 2019 Aug; 128():e841-e850. PubMed ID: 31082551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.
Thien A; King NK; Ang BT; Wang E; Ng I
World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 24909393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes following polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Punchak M; Chung LK; Lagman C; Bui TT; Lazareff J; Rezzadeh K; Jarrahy R; Yang I
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 41():30-35. PubMed ID: 28377284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Autogenous Bone Cranioplasty: Review of a 42-Year Experience by a Single Surgeon.
Cabbad NC; Stalder MW; Arroyave A; Wolfe EM; Wolfe SA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jun; 143(6):1713-1723. PubMed ID: 31136489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants - A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures.
Vince GH; Kraschl J; Rauter H; Stein M; Grossauer S; Uhl E
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 61():205-209. PubMed ID: 30396817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Leão RS; Maior JRS; Lemos CAA; Vasconcelos BCDE; Montes MAJR; Pellizzer EP; Moraes SLD
Braz Oral Res; 2018 Jun; 32():e31. PubMed ID: 29898018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of Titanium Mesh Cranioplasty in Pediatric Patients.
Ma IT; Symon MR; Bristol RE; Beals SP; Joganic EF; Adelson PD; Shafron DH; Singh DJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 29049146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of Cranioplasty Strategies for High-Risk Complex Cranial Defects: A 10-Year Experience.
Soto E; Restrepo RD; Grant JH; Myers RP
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 88(5 Suppl 5):S449-S454. PubMed ID: 34670972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The therapeutic cranioplasty still needs an ideal material and surgical timing.
Servadei F; Iaccarino C
World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 25153284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-specific implants compared with stored bone grafts for patients with interval cranioplasty.
Lethaus B; Bloebaum M; Essers B; ter Laak MP; Steiner T; Kessler P
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):206-9. PubMed ID: 24406579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cranioplasties following craniectomies in children-a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.
Klieverik VM; Miller KJ; Han KS; Singhal A; Vassilyadi M; Touchette CJ; Weil AG; Woerdeman PA
Childs Nerv Syst; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1473-1480. PubMed ID: 30554262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Titanium Mesh and Custom Implants for Cranioplasty.
Rosinski CL; Patel S; Geever B; Chiu RG; Chaker AN; Zakrzewski J; Rosenberg DM; Parola R; Shah K; Behbahani M; Mehta AI
Neurosurgery; 2020 Jan; 86(1):E15-E22. PubMed ID: 31529096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-designed polyetheretherketone implants versus titanium mesh (± acrylic cement) in alloplastic cranioplasty: a retrospective single-surgeon, single-center study.
Ng ZY; Ang WJ; Nawaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2014; 25(2):e185-9. PubMed ID: 24621767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cranioplasty Using a Mixture of Biologic and Nonbiologic Agents.
Arnaoutakis D; Bahrami A; Cohn JE; Smith JE
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 20(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 29098278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With PEEK Versus Titanium Cranioplasty Reconstruction.
Asaad M; Taslakian EN; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Bite U; Mardini S; Van Gompel JJ; Sharaf B
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jan-Feb 01; 32(1):193-197. PubMed ID: 33074970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interval cranioplasty with patient-specific implants and autogenous bone grafts--success and cost analysis.
Lethaus B; Bloebaum M; Koper D; Poort-Ter Laak M; Kessler P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1948-51. PubMed ID: 25443869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cryopreservation of Autologous Cranial Bone Flaps for Cranioplasty: A Large Sample Retrospective Study.
Fan MC; Wang QL; Sun P; Zhan SH; Guo P; Deng WS; Dong Q
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jan; 109():e853-e859. PubMed ID: 29107719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complications following titanium cranioplasty compared with nontitanium implants cranioplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu S; Chen Y; Lin F; Chen Z; Jiang X; Zhang J; Wang J
J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Feb; 84():66-74. PubMed ID: 33485602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
