251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31461029)
41. Innovation to Pediatric Cranioplasty.
Konofaos P; Wallace RD
J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):519-524. PubMed ID: 30531278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison between the different types of heterologous materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review of the literature.
Morselli C; Zaed I; Tropeano MP; Cataletti G; Iaccarino C; Rossini Z; Servadei F
J Neurosurg Sci; 2019 Dec; 63(6):723-736. PubMed ID: 31599560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Patient-specific polyetheretherketone implants for repair of craniofacial defects.
Rammos CK; Cayci C; Castro-Garcia JA; Feiz-Erfan I; Lettieri SC
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 May; 26(3):631-3. PubMed ID: 25901667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The use of frozen autogenous bone flaps in delayed cranioplasty revisited.
Iwama T; Yamada J; Imai S; Shinoda J; Funakoshi T; Sakai N
Neurosurgery; 2003 Mar; 52(3):591-6; discussion 595-6. PubMed ID: 12590683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Complications and cosmetic outcomes of materials used in cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy-a systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.
Gerstl JVE; Rendon LF; Burke SM; Doucette J; Mekary RA; Smith TR
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Dec; 164(12):3075-3090. PubMed ID: 35593924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparative evaluation of autogenous calvarial bone graft and alloplastic materials for secondary reconstruction of cranial defects.
Sahoo N; Roy ID; Desai AP; Gupta V
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 20061970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. An Outcomes Comparison Between Autologous and Alloplastic Cranioplasty in the Pediatric Population.
Fu KJ; Barr RM; Kerr ML; Shah MN; Fletcher SA; Sandberg DI; Teichgraeber JF; Greives MR
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 27035597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Intraoperative template-molded bone flap reconstruction for patient-specific cranioplasty.
Marbacher S; Andereggen L; Erhardt S; Fathi AR; Fandino J; Raabe A; Beck J
Neurosurg Rev; 2012 Oct; 35(4):527-35; discussion 535. PubMed ID: 22391771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Cranioplasty: indications and advances.
Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Bartlett SP
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 21(4):400-9. PubMed ID: 23770828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Secondary Salvage of the Unsatisfactory Microtia Reconstruction.
Reinisch JF; van Hövell Tot Westerflier CVA; Gould DJ; Tahiri YT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 May; 145(5):1252-1261. PubMed ID: 32332549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Syndrome of the Trephined: Quantitative Functional Improvement after Large Cranial Vault Reconstruction.
Tarr JT; Hagan M; Zhang B; Tanna N; Andrews BT; Lee JC; Bradley JP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jun; 145(6):1486-1494. PubMed ID: 32195855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Complex skull defects reconstruction with САD/САМ titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants.
Eolchiyan SA
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2014; 78(4):3-13. PubMed ID: 25406805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Cranioplasty for large skull defects with PMMA (Polymethylmethacrylate) or Tutoplast processed autogenic bone grafts.
Kriegel RJ; Schaller C; Clusmann H
Zentralbl Neurochir; 2007 Nov; 68(4):182-9. PubMed ID: 17966077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Clinical Outcomes After Cranioplasty With Titanium Mesh, Polyetheretherketone, or Composite Bone Cement: A Retrospective Study.
Chen K; Liang W; Zhu Q; Shen H; Yang Y; Li Y; Li H; Wang Y; Qian R
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 34(8):2246-2251. PubMed ID: 37470720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Computer-designed PEEK implants: a peek into the future of cranioplasty?
Ng ZY; Nawaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):e55-8. PubMed ID: 24406603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Reconstruction of Secondary Calvarial Defects with Ex Situ Split Calvarial Bone Grafts: Long-Term Evaluation of Outcomes.
Frautschi RS; Halasa B; Kwiecien G; Krebs J; Recinos V; Onwuzulike K; Rampazzo A; Papay F; Zins JE; Bassiri Gharb B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jan; 143(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 30589797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Cranioplasty using autologous calvarial bone graft in combination with titanium mesh plates for patients with a history of bone infections after initial cranioplasty].
Kamoshima Y; Sawamura Y; Kawashima K; Osanai T; Kashiwazaki D; Yamauchi T; Houkin K
No Shinkei Geka; 2011 Apr; 39(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 21447849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Outcomes of calvarial reconstruction in cancer patients.
Lee EI; Chao AH; Skoracki RJ; Yu P; DeMonte F; Hanasono MM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Mar; 133(3):675-682. PubMed ID: 24263391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cranioplasty in Oman: Retrospective review of cases from the National Craniofacial Center 2012-2022.
Al Alawi K; Al Furqani A; Al Shaqsi S; Shummo M; Al Jabri A; Al Balushi T
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2024 May; 24(2):250-258. PubMed ID: 38828246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty.
Honeybul S; Morrison DA; Ho KM; Lind CR; Geelhoed E
J Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 126(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 26991387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
