These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31461330)

  • 1. Short-Term Reliability of Different Methods of Contralateral Suppression of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission in Children and Adults.
    Swamy SP; Yathiraj A
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 28(2S):495-507. PubMed ID: 31461330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of measures of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with contralateral suppression.
    Stuart A; Cobb KM
    J Commun Disord; 2015; 58():35-42. PubMed ID: 26431768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in adults: A normative study.
    Zevenster S; Naudé A
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2022 Dec; 69(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 36546517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Jun; 60(6):438-445. PubMed ID: 33084414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data of contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for various noise signals.
    Kalaiah MK; Shastri U
    Data Brief; 2021 Oct; 38():107367. PubMed ID: 34568527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the Presence of Spontaneous Components Affect the Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions?
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):990-1005. PubMed ID: 33480622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
    Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in neonates.
    Durante AS; Carvalho RM
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Jun; 41(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 12154810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
    Stuart A; Preast JL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time course of the suppression effect on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions by prolonged contralateral acoustic stimulation.
    Kang HW; Shim HJ; Song SJ; Lee SH; Yoon SW
    Korean J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 16(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 24653884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the frequency selectivity of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the active mechanisms of the organ of corti by analyzing the changes in the amplitude of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
    Ibargüen AM; Santaolalla Montoya F; del Rey AS; Fernandez JM
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 19128576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-Term Test-Retest Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Click-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Subjects.
    Keppler H; Degeest S; Vinck B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 64(3):1062-1072. PubMed ID: 33719513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustically and electrically evoked contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs.
    Popelár J; Valvoda J; Syka J
    Hear Res; 1999 Sep; 135(1-2):61-70. PubMed ID: 10491955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative analysis of cochlear active mechanisms in tinnitus subjects with normal hearing sensitivity: multiparametric recording of evoked otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression.
    Paglialonga A; Del Bo L; Ravazzani P; Tognola G
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Jun; 37(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 19879078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concurrent measures of contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and of auditory steady-state responses.
    Mertes IB; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):2027. PubMed ID: 27914370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ryan S; Kemp DT
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8789819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data for a clinical test set-up.
    De Ceulaer G; Yperman M; Daemers K; Van Driessche K; Somers T; Offeciers FE; Govaerts PJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 May; 22(3):350-5. PubMed ID: 11347638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children.
    Ugur AK; Kemaloglu YK; Ugur MB; Gunduz B; Saridogan C; Yesilkaya E; Bideci A; Cinaz P; Goksu N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 19150138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of noise bandwidth on the contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Velenovsky DS; Glattke TJ
    Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 164(1-2):39-48. PubMed ID: 11950523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.