These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31461338)

  • 1. Test-Retest Reliability of Multicomponent Tympanometry at 226-, 678-, and 1000-Hz Probe Tones Over 10 Sessions.
    Singh NK; Baral TL
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 28(2S):516-523. PubMed ID: 31461338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of consecutive trials and test-retest reliability of 1000-Hz tympanometry in adults.
    Carazo CD; Sun XM
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 25262790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic stapedial reflexes in healthy neonates: normative data and test-retest reliability.
    Kei J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 22284840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of tympanometry with 226 Hz and 1000 Hz probe tones in children with Down syndrome.
    Lewis MP; Bradford Bell E; Evans AK
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Dec; 75(12):1492-5. PubMed ID: 21944057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of middle ear function in young children: clinical guidelines for the use of 226- and 1,000-Hz tympanometry.
    Alaerts J; Luts H; Wouters J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 17948353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of Multicomponent Tympanometry in Identifying Middle Ear Disorder.
    Raut M; Vanaja CS
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 71(Suppl 2):1485-1489. PubMed ID: 31750201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of tympanometry results for probe tones of 226 Hz and 1000 Hz in newborns.
    Pilka E; Kochanek K; Jedrzejczak WW; Saczek A; Skarzynski H; Niedzielski A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Aug; 147():110804. PubMed ID: 34175657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test-retest reliability in tympanometry.
    Wiley TL; Barrett KA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Oct; 34(5):1197-206. PubMed ID: 1749249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of conductive hearing loss in young infants using tympanometry and wideband reflectance.
    Prieve BA; Vander Werff KR; Preston JL; Georgantas L
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):168-78. PubMed ID: 23263407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates.
    Mazlan R; Kei J; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 19322092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developmental changes in tympanometry: a case study.
    Meyer SE; Jardine CA; Deverson W
    Br J Audiol; 1997 Jun; 31(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 9276101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility of 1000 Hz tympanometry in infants: tympanometric trace classification and choice of probe tone in relation to age.
    Hoffmann A; Deuster D; Rosslau K; Knief A; Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen A; Schmidt CM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 77(7):1198-203. PubMed ID: 23726955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative analysis of 226 Hz and 1 000 Hz probe tone tympanometry in infants].
    Xu J; Chen S; Zheng Z; Shao X; Su R; Shen A; Shi B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 27(7):371-5. PubMed ID: 23833991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of consecutive wideband tympanometry trials on energy absorbance measures of the middle ear.
    Burdiek LM; Sun XM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1997-2004. PubMed ID: 24824299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impedance and admittance tympanometry. II. Mathematical approach.
    Van Camp KJ; Vanhuyse VJ; Creten WL; Vanpeperstraete PM
    Audiology; 1978; 17(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 646729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison between video otoscopy and standard tympanometry findings in adults living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in South Africa.
    Sebothoma B; Khoza-Shangase K
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 Jul; 65(1):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 30035605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tympanometry-detection of middle ear pathologies.
    Van Camp KJ; Creten WL; Vanpeperstraete PM; Van de Heyning PH
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1980; 34(5):574-83. PubMed ID: 7468205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multifrequency tympanometry in normal adults.
    Margolis RH; Goycoolea HG
    Ear Hear; 1993 Dec; 14(6):408-13. PubMed ID: 8307245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison between 226 Hz probe tone tympanometry and spiral CT test in infants].
    Liu Z; Liu L; Yang K
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(19):887-9. PubMed ID: 23285954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tympanometry in infants with middle ear effusion having been identified using spiral computerized tomography.
    Zhiqi L; Kun Y; Zhiwu H
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2010; 31(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 20015724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.