203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31461532)
1. Comparison of CsI:Tl and Gd
Howansky A; Mishchenko A; Lubinsky AR; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4857-4868. PubMed ID: 31461532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An apparatus and method for directly measuring the depth-dependent gain and spatial resolution of turbid scintillators.
Howansky A; Lubinsky AR; Suzuki K; Ghose S; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):4927-4941. PubMed ID: 30193407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deriving depth-dependent light escape efficiency and optical Swank factor from measured pulse height spectra of scintillators.
Howansky A; Peng B; Lubinsky AR; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):847-860. PubMed ID: 28039881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Segmented crystalline scintillators: empirical and theoretical investigation of a high quantum efficiency EPID based on an initial engineering prototype CsI(TI) detector.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Perna L
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1053-66. PubMed ID: 16696482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. X-ray imaging performance of structured cesium iodide scintillators.
Zhao W; Ristic G; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2594-605. PubMed ID: 15487742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance of an IGZO-based flat-panel X-ray detector.
Sheth NM; Uneri A; Helm PA; Zbijewski W; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3053-3066. PubMed ID: 35363391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of scintillator on the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of a digital imaging system.
Farman TT; Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Miller SR; Lempicki A; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 16448925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Light output measurements and computational models of microcolumnar CsI scintillators for x-ray imaging.
Nillius P; Klamra W; Sibczynski P; Sharma D; Danielsson M; Badano A
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):600-605. PubMed ID: 28102604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a hybrid direct-indirect active matrix flat-panel imager using Monte Carlo simulation.
Dow S; Howansky A; Lubinsky AR; Zhao W
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2020 May; 7(3):033501. PubMed ID: 32411813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of a clinical unit for digital radiography based on irradiation side sampling technology.
Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Burani A
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101902. PubMed ID: 24089904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial frequency-dependent pulse-height spectrum and method for analyzing detector DQE(f) from ensembles of single X-ray images.
Dow S; Howansky A; Lubinsky AR; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):107-128. PubMed ID: 34779519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Du H; Cunningham I; Klugerman M; Shah K
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling and evaluation of a high-resolution CMOS detector for cone-beam CT of the extremities.
Cao Q; Sisniega A; Brehler M; Stayman JW; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH; Zbijewski W
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):114-130. PubMed ID: 29095489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Signal and noise transfer properties of CMOS based active pixel flat panel imager coupled to structured CsI:Tl.
Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Blakesley J; Olivo A; Speller RD
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 19235380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of scintillator-based detectors for few-ten-keV high-spatial-resolution x-ray imaging.
Larsson JC; Lundström U; Hertz HM
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2731-2740. PubMed ID: 27277020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Back-irradiated and dual-screen sandwich detector configurations for radiography.
Lubinsky AR; Howansky A; Zheng H; Zhao W
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2019 Jul; 6(3):033501. PubMed ID: 31312672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of x-ray detectors for mouse CT imaging.
Goertzen AL; Nagarkar V; Street RA; Paulus MJ; Boone JM; Cherry SR
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(23):5251-65. PubMed ID: 15656275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A piecewise-focused high DQE detector for MV imaging.
Star-Lack J; Shedlock D; Swahn D; Humber D; Wang A; Hirsh H; Zentai G; Sawkey D; Kruger I; Sun M; Abel E; Virshup G; Shin M; Fahrig R
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5084-99. PubMed ID: 26328960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative investigation of the detective quantum efficiency of direct and indirect conversion detector technologies in dedicated breast CT.
Kuttig JD; Steiding C; Kolditz D; Hupfer M; Karolczak M; Kalender WA
Phys Med; 2015 Jun; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 25841299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
