These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31461533)

  • 1. The effective point of measurement for depth-dose measurements in small MV photon beams with different detectors.
    Wegener S; Sauer OA
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5209-5215. PubMed ID: 31461533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detector response in the buildup region of small MV fields.
    Wegener S; Herzog B; Sauer OA
    Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1327-1339. PubMed ID: 31860128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental determination of the effective point of measurement for cylindrical ionization chambers in megavoltage photon beams.
    Iwafuchi Y; Oguchi H; Okudaira K; Yamamoto K
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2022 Dec; 15(4):291-297. PubMed ID: 35932415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective point of measurement of thimble ion chambers in megavoltage photon beams.
    Tessier F; Kawrakow I
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 20175470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative dosimetry with an MR-linac: Response of ion chambers, diamond, and diode detectors for off-axis, depth dose, and output factor measurements.
    O'Brien DJ; Dolan J; Pencea S; Schupp N; Sawakuchi GO
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):884-897. PubMed ID: 29178457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental determination of the effective point of measurement of cylindrical ionization chambers for high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huang Y; Willomitzer C; Zakaria GA; Hartmann GH
    Phys Med; 2010; 26(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 19926506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effective point of measurement of ionization chambers and the build-up anomaly in MV x-ray beams.
    McEwen MR; Kawrakow I; Ross CK
    Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):950-8. PubMed ID: 18404931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ion recombination and polarity corrections for small-volume ionization chambers in high-dose-rate, flattening-filter-free pulsed photon beams.
    Hyun MA; Miller JR; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):618-627. PubMed ID: 28001291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective point of measurement for parallel plate and cylindrical ion chambers in megavoltage electron beams.
    von Voigts-Rhetz P; Czarnecki D; Zink K
    Z Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 24(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 24418322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study of the effective point of measurement for ion chambers in electron beams by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Wang LL; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2034-42. PubMed ID: 19610292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SU-E-T-174: Synopsis of the Experimental and Monte Carlo Calculated Values of the Radial EPOM Shift of Cylindrical Ionization Chambers for Photon-Beam Dosimetry.
    Harder D; Looe H; Poppe B
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3743. PubMed ID: 28517829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gradient corrections for reference dosimetry using Farmer-type ionization chambers in single-layer scanned proton fields.
    Palmans H; Medin J; Trnková P; Vatnitsky S
    Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6531-6539. PubMed ID: 33111370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose k(Q) factors in megavoltage photon beams.
    McEwen MR
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2179-93. PubMed ID: 20527552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Possibility of using cylindrical ionization chambers for percent depth-dose measurements in clinical electron beams.
    Ono T; Araki F; Yoshiyama F
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4647-54. PubMed ID: 21928637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental investigation of the effective point of measurement for plane-parallel chambers used in electron beam dosimetry.
    Yasui K; Nakajima Y; Suda Y; Arai Y; Takizawa T; Sakai K; Fujita Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 24(7):e14059. PubMed ID: 37307247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of 0.5r
    Anusionwu PC; Alpuche Aviles JE; Pistorius S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):117-126. PubMed ID: 31898872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo study of ionization chamber magnetic field correction factors as a function of angle and beam quality.
    Malkov VN; Rogers DWO
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):908-925. PubMed ID: 29218730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detector to detector corrections: a comprehensive experimental study of detector specific correction factors for beam output measurements for small radiotherapy beams.
    Azangwe G; Grochowska P; Georg D; Izewska J; Hopfgartner J; Lechner W; Andersen CE; Beierholm AR; Helt-Hansen J; Mizuno H; Fukumura A; Yajima K; Gouldstone C; Sharpe P; Meghzifene A; Palmans H
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):072103. PubMed ID: 24989398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.