149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31463566)
1. Distinctive encoding of a subset of DRM lists yields not only benefits, but also costs and spillovers.
Huff MJ; Bodner GE; Gretz MR
Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):280-290. PubMed ID: 31463566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigm.
Huff MJ; Bodner GE
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1493-1506. PubMed ID: 30188245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of distinctive encoding on correct and false memory: a meta-analytic review of costs and benefits and their origins in the DRM paradigm.
Huff MJ; Bodner GE; Fawcett JM
Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):349-65. PubMed ID: 24853535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Getting at the source of distinctive encoding effects in the DRM paradigm: evidence from signal-detection measures and source judgments.
Bodner GE; Huff MJ; Lamontagne RW; Azad T
Memory; 2017 May; 25(5):647-655. PubMed ID: 27387376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Drawing individual images benefits recognition accuracy in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
Namias JM; Huff MJ; Smith A; Maxwell NP
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Aug; 75(8):1571-1582. PubMed ID: 34661459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.
Huff MJ; Bodner GE; Gretz MR
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():602347. PubMed ID: 33329270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists: an item-order account.
McDaniel MA; Cahill M; Bugg JM; Meadow NG
Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1162-73. PubMed ID: 21584853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.
Huff MJ; Aschenbrenner AJ
Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1287-1301. PubMed ID: 29959616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
Huff MJ; Bodner GE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Identify-to-reject": a specific strategy to avoid false memories in the DRM paradigm.
Carneiro P; Fernandez A; Diez E; Garcia-Marques L; Ramos T; Ferreira MB
Mem Cognit; 2012 Feb; 40(2):252-65. PubMed ID: 21971606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Generative processing and emotional false memories: a generation "cost" for negative false memory formation but only after delay.
Knott L; Wilkinson S; Hellenthal M; Shah D; Howe ML
Cogn Emot; 2022 Nov; 36(7):1448-1457. PubMed ID: 36196863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. False memories in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients: A preliminary investigation with the DRM paradigm.
Pitteri M; Vannucci M; Ziccardi S; Beccherle M; Semenza C; Calabrese M
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2020 Jan; 37():101418. PubMed ID: 32172993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence for adult age-invariance in associative false recognition.
Pansuwan T; Breuer F; Gazder T; Lau Z; Cueva S; Swanson L; Taylor M; Wilson M; Morcom AM
Memory; 2020 Feb; 28(2):172-186. PubMed ID: 31868124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Item-specific encoding reduces false recognition of homograph and implicit mediated critical lures.
Smith KA; Huff MJ; Pazos LA; Smith JL; Cosentino KM
Memory; 2022 Mar; 30(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 34895075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Generation and mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm.
Guntre RW; Bodner GE; Azad T
Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 17910191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of distinctive processing manipulations on older adults' false memory.
Butler KM; McDaniel MA; McCabe DP; Dornburg CC
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 Mar; 17(2):129-59. PubMed ID: 19642045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relational and item-specific influences on generate-recognize processes in recall.
Guynn MJ; McDaniel MA; Strosser GL; Ramirez JM; Castleberry EH; Arnett KH
Mem Cognit; 2014 Feb; 42(2):198-211. PubMed ID: 24425424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Putting false memories into context: the effects of odour contexts on correct and false recall
Woods JA; Dewhurst SA
Memory; 2019 Mar; 27(3):379-386. PubMed ID: 30139301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive false memory: Imagining future scenarios increases false memories in the DRM paradigm.
Dewhurst SA; Anderson RJ; Grace L; van Esch L
Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1076-84. PubMed ID: 27173584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Eye-closure & the retrieval of item-specific information in recognition memory.
Parker A; Dagnall N
Conscious Cogn; 2020 Jan; 77():102858. PubMed ID: 31837571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
