200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31463685)
1. Physician Beliefs About Online Reporting of Quality and Experience Data.
Lagu T; Haskell J; Cooper E; Harris DA; Murray A; Gardner RL
J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2542-2548. PubMed ID: 31463685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Public Awareness, Usage, and Predictors for the Use of Doctor Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study in England.
Patel S; Cain R; Neailey K; Hooberman L
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jul; 20(7):e243. PubMed ID: 30045831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.
Bardach NS; Hibbard JH; Greaves F; Dudley RA
J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e102. PubMed ID: 25934100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Holliday AM; Kachalia A; Meyer GS; Sequist TD
J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Jun; 32(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 28150098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].
Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.
Kadry B; Chu LF; Kadry B; Gammas D; Macario A
J Med Internet Res; 2011 Nov; 13(4):e95. PubMed ID: 22088924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physician choice making and characteristics associated with using physician-rating websites: cross-sectional study.
Emmert M; Meier F; Pisch F; Sander U
J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e187. PubMed ID: 23985220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptions of electronic health record implementation: a statewide survey of physicians in Rhode Island.
Wylie MC; Baier RR; Gardner RL
Am J Med; 2014 Oct; 127(10):1010.e21-7. PubMed ID: 24945882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.
Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reporting of Patient Experience Data on Health Systems' Websites and Commercial Physician-Rating Websites: Mixed-Methods Analysis.
Lagu T; Norton CM; Russo LM; Priya A; Goff SL; Lindenauer PK
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e12007. PubMed ID: 30916654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients' choices of physicians.
Burkle CM; Keegan MT
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():416. PubMed ID: 26410383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
Emmert M; Meszmer N; Sander U
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e254. PubMed ID: 27644135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.
Gao GG; McCullough JS; Agarwal R; Jha AK
J Med Internet Res; 2012 Feb; 14(1):e38. PubMed ID: 22366336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of Health Information Technology by Rhode Island Physicians and Advanced Practice Providers, 2019.
Mandeville B; Cooper E; Haskell J; Viner-Brown S; Gardner RL
R I Med J (2013); 2020 Feb; 103(1):21-24. PubMed ID: 32013299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physician Rating Websites: What Aspects Are Important to Identify a Good Doctor, and Are Patients Capable of Assessing Them? A Mixed-Methods Approach Including Physicians' and Health Care Consumers' Perspectives.
Rothenfluh F; Schulz PJ
J Med Internet Res; 2017 May; 19(5):e127. PubMed ID: 28461285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Survey of Interventional Cardiologists' Attitudes and Beliefs About Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Blumenthal DM; Valsdottir LR; Zhao Y; Shen C; Kirtane AJ; Pinto DS; Resnic FS; Maddox KEJ; Wasfy JH; Mehran R; Rosenfield K; Yeh RW
JAMA Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 3(7):629-634. PubMed ID: 29801157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parental awareness and use of online physician rating sites.
Hanauer DA; Zheng K; Singer DC; Gebremariam A; Davis MM
Pediatrics; 2014 Oct; 134(4):e966-75. PubMed ID: 25246629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data.
Bidmon S; Elshiewy O; Terlutter R; Boztug Y
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e13830. PubMed ID: 32012063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
