These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31463685)

  • 21. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data.
    Bidmon S; Elshiewy O; Terlutter R; Boztug Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e13830. PubMed ID: 32012063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patients' evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites.
    Lagu T; Hannon NS; Rothberg MB; Lindenauer PK
    J Gen Intern Med; 2010 Sep; 25(9):942-6. PubMed ID: 20464523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Physicians' participation in the Physicians' Quality Reporting Initiative and their perceptions of its impact on quality of care.
    Federman AD; Keyhani S
    Health Policy; 2011 Oct; 102(2-3):229-34. PubMed ID: 21628079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?
    Rothenfluh F; Germeni E; Schulz PJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jun; 18(6):e129. PubMed ID: 27311623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Association Between Physician Online Rating and Quality of Care.
    Okike K; Peter-Bibb TK; Xie KC; Okike ON
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Dec; 18(12):e324. PubMed ID: 27965191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physician rating websites: do radiologists have an online presence?
    Gilbert K; Hawkins CM; Hughes DR; Patel K; Gogia N; Sekhar A; Duszak R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Aug; 12(8):867-71. PubMed ID: 26250980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Chronic Pain Practices: An Evaluation of Positive and Negative Online Patient Reviews.
    Orhurhu MS; Salisu B; Sottosanti E; Abimbola N; Urits I; Jones M; Viswanath O; Kaye AD; Simopoulos T; Orhurhu V
    Pain Physician; 2019 Sep; 22(5):E477-E486. PubMed ID: 31561660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Physician Perspectives on Factors Contributing to Readmissions and Potential Prevention Strategies: A Multicenter Survey.
    Herzig SJ; Schnipper JL; Doctoroff L; Kim CS; Flanders SA; Robinson EJ; Ruhnke GW; Thomas L; Kripalani S; Lindenauer PK; Williams MV; Metlay JP; Auerbach AD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1287-1293. PubMed ID: 27282857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The patient-doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey.
    Bosslet GT; Torke AM; Hickman SE; Terry CL; Helft PR
    J Gen Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 26(10):1168-74. PubMed ID: 21706268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do German public reporting websites provide information that office-based physicians consider before referring patients to hospital? A four-step analysis.
    Kolb B; Emmert M; Sander U; Patzelt C; Schöffski O
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Nov; 137-138():42-53. PubMed ID: 30190204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consumer response to patient experience measures in complex information environments.
    Schlesinger M; Kanouse DE; Rybowski L; Martino SC; Shaller D
    Med Care; 2012 Nov; 50 Suppl():S56-64. PubMed ID: 23064278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Online Physician Reviews Do Not Reflect Patient Satisfaction Survey Responses.
    Widmer RJ; Maurer MJ; Nayar VR; Aase LA; Wald JT; Kotsenas AL; Timimi FK; Harper CM; Pruthi S
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2018 Apr; 93(4):453-457. PubMed ID: 29622095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System.
    Okike K; Uhr NR; Shin SYM; Xie KC; Kim CY; Funahashi TT; Kanter MH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 31531811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using electronic surveys to gather information on physician practices during a response to a local epidemic--Rhode Island, 2011.
    Minniear TD; McIntosh EB; Alexander N; Weidle PJ; Fulton J
    Ann Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):521-3. PubMed ID: 23830934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital Footprint of Neurological Surgeons.
    Kim C; Gupta R; Shah A; Madill E; Prabhu AV; Agarwal N
    World Neurosurg; 2018 May; 113():e172-e178. PubMed ID: 29427816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physician-Rating Web Sites: Ethical Implications.
    Samora JB; Lifchez SD; Blazar PE;
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):104-10.e1. PubMed ID: 26304734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of training on physician attitudes and practices in home and community care of the elderly.
    Schwartzberg JG; Guttman R
    Arch Fam Med; 1997; 6(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 9305686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians' Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period.
    Emmert M; Sauter L; Jablonski L; Sander U; Taheri-Zadeh F
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e275. PubMed ID: 28747292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians.
    Murray E; Lo B; Pollack L; Donelan K; Catania J; Lee K; Zapert K; Turner R
    J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(3):e17. PubMed ID: 14517108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.