These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3146371)
1. Sensitivity and specificity of Rinne tuning fork test. Browning GG; Swan IR BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6660):1381-2. PubMed ID: 3146371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity and specificity of Rinne tuning fork test. Thijs C; Leffers P BMJ; 1989 Jan; 298(6668):255. PubMed ID: 2493884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Rinne tuning fork test. Swan IR Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1989 Sep; 24(9A):99-102. PubMed ID: 2506208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Rinne test for conductive deafness. A critical reappraisal. Chole RA; Cook GB Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1988 Apr; 114(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 3348896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Tuning fork study in deafness. Thus function Rinne and Weber tests]. Ziemer C MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Apr; 148(15):18. PubMed ID: 16711196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Bing test in the detection of conductive hearing impairment. Swan IR; Browning GG Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1989 Dec; 14(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 2692884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The tuning fork--an essential instrument in otologic practice. Doyle PJ; Anderson DW; Pijl S J Otolaryngol; 1984 Apr; 13(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 6726852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Observations on the Rinne test. Haughton PM; Pearce JM Lancet; 1982 Apr; 1(8276):829-30. PubMed ID: 6122058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test. Burkey JM; Lippy WH; Schuring AG; Rizer FM Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9455950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recommended procedure for Rinne and Weber tuning fork tests. Hinchcliffe R Br J Audiol; 1988 May; 22(2):153. PubMed ID: 3390630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss. Miltenburg DM J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 7996624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recommended procedure for Rinne and Weber tuning-fork tests. British Society of Audiology. Br J Audiol; 1987 Aug; 21(3):229-30. PubMed ID: 3620757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rinne revisited: steel versus aluminum tuning forks. MacKechnie CA; Greenberg JJ; Gerkin RC; McCall AA; Hirsch BE; Durrant JD; Raz Y Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 24085711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is there still a role for tuning-fork tests? Browning GG Br J Audiol; 1987 Aug; 21(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 3620750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Accuracy of Tuning Fork Tests for Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review. Kelly EA; Li B; Adams ME Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Aug; 159(2):220-230. PubMed ID: 29661046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined tuning fork tests in hearing loss: explorative clinical study of the patterns. Vikram KB; Naseeruddin K J Otolaryngol; 2004 Aug; 33(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 15903203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of the Weber and Rinne tuning fork tests in evaluation of children with otitis media with effusion. Behn A; Westerberg BD; Zhang H; Riding KH; Ludemann JP; Kozak FK J Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 17942032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]