These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31463995)

  • 1. An ambiguity in Habermas's argument against liberal eugenics.
    Schäfer LP
    Bioethics; 2019 Nov; 33(9):1059-1064. PubMed ID: 31463995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Autonomy, natality and freedom: a liberal re-examination of Habermas in the enhancement debate.
    Pugh J
    Bioethics; 2015 Mar; 29(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 24547807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An empirically informed critique of Habermas' argument from human nature.
    Morar N
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Feb; 21(1):95-113. PubMed ID: 24446150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The silencing of Kierkegaard in Habermas' critique of genetic enhancement.
    Christiansen K
    Med Health Care Philos; 2009 Jun; 12(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 19234761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Liberal eugenics and human nature. Against Habermas.
    Fenton E
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(6):35-42. PubMed ID: 17278871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rereading Habermas in Times of CRISPR-cas: A Critique of and an Alternative to the Instrumentalist Interpretation of the Human Nature Argument.
    Wienmeister A
    J Bioeth Inq; 2022 Dec; 19(4):545-556. PubMed ID: 36149578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remarks on Habermas's presentation of "L'avenir de la nature humaine".
    Lafont C
    APA Newsl Philos Med; 2003; 3(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 15115010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In defense of prenatal genetic interventions.
    Murphy TF
    Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):335-42. PubMed ID: 23025348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans.
    Walton D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1507-1528. PubMed ID: 28000092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Back to the future: Habermas's The Future of Human Nature.
    Prusak BG
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2007; 37(2):4; author reply 6. PubMed ID: 17474336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From species ethics to social concerns: Habermas's critique of "liberal eugenics" evaluated.
    Árnason V
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2014 Oct; 35(5):353-67. PubMed ID: 25234409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In Genes We Trust: Germline Engineering, Eugenics, and the Future of the Human Genome.
    Powell R
    J Med Philos; 2015 Dec; 40(6):669-95. PubMed ID: 26475170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genes, justice, and obligations to future people.
    Kamm FM
    Soc Philos Policy; 2002; 19(2):360-88. PubMed ID: 12678094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rethinking "Liberal eugenics": reflections and questions on Habermas on bioethics.
    Prusak BG
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(6):31-42. PubMed ID: 16396203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Debunking the slippery slope argument against human germ-line gene therapy.
    Resnik D
    J Med Philos; 1994 Feb; 19(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 8201288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A sketch of L'avenir de la nature humaine.
    Habermas J
    APA Newsl Philos Med; 2003; 3(1):155-7. PubMed ID: 15115009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-generational retribution and genetic engineering: reflections on chance and free will.
    Troster L
    Conserv Jud; 2002; 54(3):33-41. PubMed ID: 12735299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regulating eugenics.
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Apr; 121(6):1578-99. PubMed ID: 18524068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The hermeneutic challenge of genetic engineering: Habermas and the transhumanists.
    Edgar A
    Med Health Care Philos; 2009 Jun; 12(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 19219641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The debate over liberal eugenics.
    Brock DW
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(2):5-6; author reply 6-7. PubMed ID: 16604886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.