These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31464110)

  • 1. Continuous electronic fetal heart monitoring versus intermittent auscultation during labor: Would the literature outcomes have the same results if they were interpreted following the NICHHD guidelines?
    Tommaso MD; Pinzauti S; Bandinelli S; Poli C; Ragusa A
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Sep; 28(9):1193-1198. PubMed ID: 31464110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Vintzileos AM; Nochimson DJ; Guzman ER; Knuppel RA; Lake M; Schifrin BS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 7800313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal Heart Rate Auscultation, 3rd edition.
    Wisner K; Holschuh C
    Nurs Womens Health; 2018 Dec; 22(6):e1-e32. PubMed ID: 30501909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic fetal monitoring during labor.
    Kurse J
    J Fam Pract; 1982 Jul; 15(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 7086382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
    Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing.
    Devane D; Lalor JG; Daly S; McGuire W; Smith V
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD005122. PubMed ID: 22336808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal health surveillance in labour.
    Liston R; Crane J; Hamilton E; Hughes O; Kuling S; MacKinnon C; McNamara H; Milne K; Richardson B; Trépanie MJ; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Mar; 24(3):250-76; quiz 277-80. PubMed ID: 12196876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal heart rate auscultation: current and future practice.
    Feinstein NF
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2000; 29(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 10839579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring the fetus in labor: evidence to support the methods.
    Albers LL
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2001; 46(6):366-73. PubMed ID: 11783684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor.
    Thacker SB; Stroup D; Chang M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD000063. PubMed ID: 11405949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.
    Alfirevic Z; Devane D; Gyte GM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jul; (3):CD006066. PubMed ID: 16856111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intermittent versus continuous electronic monitoring in labour: a randomised study.
    Herbst A; Ingemarsson I
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Aug; 101(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 7947499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinical interpretation and significance of electronic fetal heart rate patterns 2 h before delivery: an institutional observational study.
    Maso G; Businelli C; Piccoli M; Montico M; De Seta F; Sartore A; Alberico S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1153-9. PubMed ID: 22791414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.
    Devane D; Lalor J; Bonnar J
    Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 17432809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electronic Fetal Monitoring and Cesarean Birth: A Scoping Review.
    Paterno MT; McElroy K; Regan M
    Birth; 2016 Dec; 43(4):277-284. PubMed ID: 27565450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate during labor: an opportunity for shared decision making.
    Hersh S; Megregian M; Emeis C
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 24758413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal ST segment heart rate analysis in labor: improvement of intervention criteria using interpolated base deficit.
    Mansano RZ; Beall MH; Ross MG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Jan; 20(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17437199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor.
    Thacker SB; Stroup DF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000063. PubMed ID: 10796109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.