These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31464110)

  • 21. Using fetal scalp stimulation with Doppler ultrasonography to enhance intermittent auscultation in low-resource settings: a diagnostic trial from Tanzania.
    Goodman DM; Mlay P; Thielman N; Small MJ; Schmitt JW
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Feb; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 30760224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. WITHDRAWN: Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor.
    Thacker SB; Stroup D; Chang M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; 2006(3):CD000063. PubMed ID: 17636581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour: a critical appraisal.
    Maso G; Piccoli M; De Seta F; Parolin S; Banco R; Camacho Mattos L; Bogatti P; Alberico S
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Feb; 67(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 25411863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future.
    Stout MJ; Cahill AG
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):127-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21353094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring during labour: A systematic scoping review to identify methods, effects, and accuracy.
    Blix E; Maude R; Hals E; Kisa S; Karlsen E; Nohr EA; de Jonge A; Lindgren H; Downe S; Reinar LM; Foureur M; Pay ASD; Kaasen A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219573. PubMed ID: 31291375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The first cesarean: role of "fetal distress" diagnosis.
    Costantine MM; Saade GR
    Semin Perinatol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 23009972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intermittent Auscultation for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Surveillance: American College of Nurse-Midwives.
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 26461195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Should women be given a choice about fetal assessment in labor?
    Wood SH
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2003; 28(5):292-8; quiz 299-300. PubMed ID: 14501630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Whither electronic fetal monitoring?
    Sandmire HF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):1130-4. PubMed ID: 2234724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A randomised controlled trial of admission electronic fetal monitoring in normal labour.
    Cheyne H; Dunlop A; Shields N; Mathers AM
    Midwifery; 2003 Sep; 19(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 12946338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Admission cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart in low-risk pregnancy during evaluation for possible labour admission - a multicentre randomised trial: the ADCAR trial.
    Smith V; Begley C; Newell J; Higgins S; Murphy DJ; White MJ; Morrison JJ; Canny S; O'Donovan D; Devane D
    BJOG; 2019 Jan; 126(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 30126064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
    Timonen S; Holmberg K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Association of electronic fetal monitoring during labor with cesarean section rate and with neonatal morbidity and mortality.
    McCusker J; Harris DR; Hosmer DW
    Am J Public Health; 1988 Sep; 78(9):1170-4. PubMed ID: 3407813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor.
    Luthy DA; Shy KK; van Belle G; Larson EB; Hughes JP; Benedetti TJ; Brown ZA; Effer S; King JF; Stenchever MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 3554055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Clinical use of central electronic monitoring system].
    Guo X; Xu H; Xie K
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11831942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of continuous electronic fetal monitoring on mode of delivery and neonatal outcome among low-risk laboring mothers at Debre Markos comprehensive specialized hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.
    Kebede TN; Abebe KA; Chekol MS; Moltot Kitaw T; Mihret MS; Fentie BM; Sibhat YA; Tizazu MA; Beshah SH; Taye BT
    Front Glob Womens Health; 2024; 5():1385343. PubMed ID: 38979032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation in detecting fetal acidemia at birth.
    Vintzileos AM; Nochimson DJ; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Guzman ER; Knuppel RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1021-4. PubMed ID: 7485287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Consumer information on fetal heart rate monitoring during labor: a content analysis: a content analysis.
    Torres J; De Vries R; Low LK
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2014; 28(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 24781772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The medical and legal risks of the electronic fetal monitor.
    Lent M
    Stanford Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 51(4):807-37. PubMed ID: 10557629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Cahill AG; Spain J
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 58(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 25811127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.