These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31464168)
1. Electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) with the Naída CI Q90 sound processor in experienced cochlear implant users. Battmer RD; Scholz S; Geissler G; Ernst A Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):331-340. PubMed ID: 31464168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects. Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation. Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome evaluation on cochlear implant users with residual hearing. Neben N; Buechner A; Schuessler M; Lenarz T Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 29214896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech perception in noise: Impact of directional microphones in users of combined electric-acoustic stimulation. Weissgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213251. PubMed ID: 30840668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation. Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Adunka MC J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chronic Electro-Acoustic Stimulation May Interfere With Electric Threshold Recovery After Cochlear Implantation in the Aged Guinea Pig. Reiss LAJ; Lawrence MB; Omelchenko IA; He W; Kirk JR Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1554-1567. PubMed ID: 38992863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing maps for electric acoustic stimulation users. Yoon YS; Shin YR; Kim JM; Coltisor A; Chun YM Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):106-115. PubMed ID: 30694120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users. Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing. Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience. Helbig S; Baumann U; Helbig M; von Malsen-Waldkirch N; Gstoettner W ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array. Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electroacoustic Stimulation. Li C; Kuhlmey M; Kim AH Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2019 Apr; 52(2):311-322. PubMed ID: 30617011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception. Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant. Boyd PJ Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report. Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicenter US Clinical Trial With an Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System in Adults: Final Outcomes. Pillsbury HC; Dillon MT; Buchman CA; Staecker H; Prentiss SM; Ruckenstein MJ; Bigelow DC; Telischi FF; Martinez DM; Runge CL; Friedland DR; Blevins NH; Larky JB; Alexiades G; Kaylie DM; Roland PS; Miyamoto RT; Backous DD; Warren FM; El-Kashlan HK; Slager HK; Reyes C; Racey AI; Adunka OF Otol Neurotol; 2018 Mar; 39(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 29342054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing. Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]