174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31464168)
1. Electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) with the Naída CI Q90 sound processor in experienced cochlear implant users.
Battmer RD; Scholz S; Geissler G; Ernst A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):331-340. PubMed ID: 31464168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome evaluation on cochlear implant users with residual hearing.
Neben N; Buechner A; Schuessler M; Lenarz T
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 29214896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech perception in noise: Impact of directional microphones in users of combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
Weissgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213251. PubMed ID: 30840668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation.
Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Adunka MC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing maps for electric acoustic stimulation users.
Yoon YS; Shin YR; Kim JM; Coltisor A; Chun YM
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):106-115. PubMed ID: 30694120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.
Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience.
Helbig S; Baumann U; Helbig M; von Malsen-Waldkirch N; Gstoettner W
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.
Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W
Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electroacoustic Stimulation.
Li C; Kuhlmey M; Kim AH
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2019 Apr; 52(2):311-322. PubMed ID: 30617011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
Boyd PJ
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.
Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicenter US Clinical Trial With an Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System in Adults: Final Outcomes.
Pillsbury HC; Dillon MT; Buchman CA; Staecker H; Prentiss SM; Ruckenstein MJ; Bigelow DC; Telischi FF; Martinez DM; Runge CL; Friedland DR; Blevins NH; Larky JB; Alexiades G; Kaylie DM; Roland PS; Miyamoto RT; Backous DD; Warren FM; El-Kashlan HK; Slager HK; Reyes C; Racey AI; Adunka OF
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Mar; 39(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 29342054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
