These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31464168)

  • 21. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acceptance and Benefits of Electro-Acoustic Stimulation for Conventional-Length Electrode Arrays.
    Spitzer ER; Waltzman SB; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 32721977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.
    Gifford RH; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Menapace C; Buck B; Crosson J; O'Neill L; Beiter A; Segel P
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):539-553. PubMed ID: 28301392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device - a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Helbig S; Baumann U
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():81-87. PubMed ID: 19955724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):868-882. PubMed ID: 31592902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Mamelle E; Granger B; Sterkers O; Lahlou G; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 277(3):705-713. PubMed ID: 31802226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bilateral electric acoustic stimulation: a comparison of partial and deep cochlear electrode insertion. A longitudinal case study.
    Kleine Punte A; Vermeire K; Van de Heyning P
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():144-152. PubMed ID: 19955731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
    Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments.
    Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Dillon MT; O'Connell BP; Canfarotta MW; Buss E; Hopfinger J
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Jun; 31(2):322-337. PubMed ID: 35394798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients.
    Tejani VD; Kim JS; Etler CP; Skidmore J; Yuan Y; He S; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1014-1028. PubMed ID: 36790447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. EAS-Combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Dhanasingh A; Hochmair I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 141(sup1):22-62. PubMed ID: 33818263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation.
    James CJ; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Lenarz T; Mawman D; Ramos A; Ramsden R; Sterkers O
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():57-62. PubMed ID: 17063012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation.
    Vaerenberg B; Péan V; Lesbros G; De Ceulaer G; Schauwers K; Daemers K; Gnansia D; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23321588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].
    Rader T
    HNO; 2015 Feb; 63(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 25515123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. From electric acoustic stimulation to improved sound coding in cochlear implants.
    Nopp P; Polak M
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():88-95. PubMed ID: 19955725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.