These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31464485)

  • 1. 99% impossible: A valid, or falsifiable, internal meta-analysis.
    Vosgerau J; Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1628-1639. PubMed ID: 31464485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.
    Friese M; Frankenbach J
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):456-471. PubMed ID: 31789538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
    Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why selective publication of statistically significant results can be effective.
    de Winter J; Happee R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66463. PubMed ID: 23840479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling publication bias and p-hacking.
    Moss J; De Bin R
    Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):319-331. PubMed ID: 34510407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some properties of p-curves, with an application to gradual publication bias.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):546-560. PubMed ID: 28425729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. P-curve: a key to the file-drawer.
    Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):534-47. PubMed ID: 23855496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.
    Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity analysis for the interactive effects of internal bias and publication bias in meta-analyses.
    Mathur MB
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jan; 15(1):21-43. PubMed ID: 37743567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. P-hacking in meta-analyses: A formalization and new meta-analytic methods.
    Mathur MB
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):483-499. PubMed ID: 38273211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
    Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
    Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Harnessing the power of excess statistical significance: Weighted and iterative least squares.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):407-420. PubMed ID: 35549315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Significance bias: an empirical evaluation of the oral health literature.
    Kagereki E; Gakonyo J; Simila H
    BMC Oral Health; 2016 May; 16(1):53. PubMed ID: 27150796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is there a "best" way to detect and minimize publication bias? An empirical evaluation.
    Pham B; Platt R; McAuley L; Klassen TP; Moher D
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Jun; 24(2):109-25. PubMed ID: 11523382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correcting for the multiplicative and additive effects of measurement unreliability in meta-analysis of correlations.
    Ke Z; Tong X
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Feb; 28(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 34647759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finding the power to reduce publication bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JP
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(10):1580-1598. PubMed ID: 28127782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Still no evidence that risk-taking and consumer choices can be primed by mating motives: Reply to Sundie, Beal, Neuberg, and Kenrick (2019).
    Shanks DR; Vadillo MA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Apr; 148(4):e12-e22. PubMed ID: 30973267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.
    Head ML; Holman L; Lanfear R; Kahn AT; Jennions MD
    PLoS Biol; 2015 Mar; 13(3):e1002106. PubMed ID: 25768323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. P-Curve Analysis of the Köhler Motivation Gain Effect in Exercise Settings: A Demonstration of a Novel Technique to Estimate Evidential Value Across Multiple Studies.
    Hill CR; Samendinger S; Rymal AM
    Ann Behav Med; 2021 Jun; 55(6):543-556. PubMed ID: 33031538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.