These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31464572)

  • 1. Identification of Important Features in Mobile Health Applications for Surgical Site Infection Surveillance.
    Chernetsky Tejedor S; Sharma J; Lavallee DC; Lober WB; Evans HL
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2019 Oct; 20(7):530-534. PubMed ID: 31464572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Engaging Patients in Co-Design of Mobile Health Tools for Surgical Site Infection Surveillance: Implications for Research and Implementation.
    Lavallee DC; Lee JR; Semple JL; Lober WB; Evans HL
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2019 Oct; 20(7):535-540. PubMed ID: 31429644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Stakeholder-Driven Framework for Evaluating Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Technologies.
    Lee JR; Evans HL; Lober WB; Lavallee DC;
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2019 Oct; 20(7):588-591. PubMed ID: 31347988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technological Advances in Clinical Definition and Surveillance Methodology for Surgical Site Infection Incorporating Surgical Site Imaging and Patient-Generated Health Data.
    Sawyer RG; Evans HL; Hedrick TL
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2019 Oct; 20(7):541-545. PubMed ID: 31460834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Roadmap for Automatic Surgical Site Infection Detection and Evaluation Using User-Generated Incision Images.
    Jiang Z; Ardywibowo R; Samereh A; Evans HL; Lober WB; Chang X; Qian X; Wang Z; Huang S
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2019 Oct; 20(7):555-565. PubMed ID: 31424335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Executive Summary of the Assessing Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Technologies (ASSIST) Project.
    Evans HL;
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2019 Oct; 20(7):527-529. PubMed ID: 31335255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mobile technology in health (mHealth) and antenatal care-Searching for apps and available solutions: A systematic review.
    Haddad SM; Souza RT; Cecatti JG
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Jul; 127():1-8. PubMed ID: 31128820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Use of Mobile Apps and SMS Messaging as Physical and Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review.
    Rathbone AL; Prescott J
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e295. PubMed ID: 28838887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Standards-Based Architecture Proposal for Integrating Patient mHealth Apps to Electronic Health Record Systems.
    Marceglia S; Fontelo P; Rossi E; Ackerman MJ
    Appl Clin Inform; 2015; 6(3):488-505. PubMed ID: 26448794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mobile Health Applications for Pediatric Care: Review and Comparison.
    Morse SS; Murugiah MK; Soh YC; Wong TW; Ming LC
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2018 May; 52(3):383-391. PubMed ID: 29714538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mobile health tools for the management of chronic respiratory diseases.
    Sleurs K; Seys SF; Bousquet J; Fokkens WJ; Gorris S; Pugin B; Hellings PW
    Allergy; 2019 Jul; 74(7):1292-1306. PubMed ID: 30644567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mobile Apps in Oncology: A Survey on Health Care Professionals' Attitude Toward Telemedicine, mHealth, and Oncological Apps.
    Kessel KA; Vogel MME; Schmidt-Graf F; Combs SE
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Nov; 18(11):e312. PubMed ID: 27884810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diabetes mHealth Apps: Designing for Greater Uptake.
    Brahmbhatt R; Niakan S; Saha N; Tewari A; Pirani A; Keshavjee N; Mugambi D; Alavi N; Keshavjee K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 234():49-53. PubMed ID: 28186014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mobile Medical Apps and mHealth Devices: A Framework to Build Medical Apps and mHealth Devices in an Ethical Manner to Promote Safer Use - A Literature Review.
    Sharp M; O'Sullivan D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 235():363-367. PubMed ID: 28423815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient perspectives on post-discharge surgical site infections: towards a patient-centered mobile health solution.
    Sanger PC; Hartzler A; Han SM; Armstrong CA; Stewart MR; Lordon RJ; Lober WB; Evans HL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114016. PubMed ID: 25436912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of eHealth and mHealth technology by persons with multiple sclerosis.
    Marrie RA; Leung S; Tyry T; Cutter GR; Fox R; Salter A
    Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2019 Jan; 27():13-19. PubMed ID: 30296732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Descriptive, Qualitative Study of Women Who Use Mobile Health Applications to Obtain Perinatal Health Information.
    Connor K; Wambach K; Baird MB
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2018 Nov; 47(6):728-737. PubMed ID: 29856963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effectiveness of Self-Management Mobile Phone and Tablet Apps in Long-term Condition Management: A Systematic Review.
    Whitehead L; Seaton P
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 May; 18(5):e97. PubMed ID: 27185295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mobile Health Applications for Caring of Older People: Review and Comparison.
    Anthony Berauk VL; Murugiah MK; Soh YC; Chuan Sheng Y; Wong TW; Ming LC
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2018 May; 52(3):374-382. PubMed ID: 29714532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient-Directed Active Surgical Incisions Surveillance May Lead to Further Surgical Site Infection Reduction.
    Dellinger EP
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2019 Oct; 20(7):584-587. PubMed ID: 31329025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.