These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31465469)

  • 1. Users' and therapists' perceptions of myoelectric multi-function upper limb prostheses with conventional and pattern recognition control.
    Franzke AW; Kristoffersen MB; Bongers RM; Murgia A; Pobatschnig B; Unglaube F; van der Sluis CK
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220899. PubMed ID: 31465469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of EMG pattern recognition for upper limb prosthesis control: a case study in comparison with direct myoelectric control.
    Resnik L; Huang HH; Winslow A; Crouch DL; Zhang F; Wolk N
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):23. PubMed ID: 29544501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of environment: Experiences of users of myoelectric arm prosthesis-a qualitative study.
    Widehammar C; Pettersson I; Janeslätt G; Hermansson L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 28470129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the real-time controllability of pattern recognition to conventional myoelectric control for discrete and simultaneous movements.
    Young AJ; Smith LH; Rouse EJ; Hargrove LJ
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 11():5. PubMed ID: 24410948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the Ability of Congenital Upper Extremity Amputees to Control a Multi-Degree of Freedom Myoelectric Prosthesis.
    Kaluf B; Gart MS; Loeffler BJ; Gaston G
    J Hand Surg Am; 2022 Oct; 47(10):1019.e1-1019.e9. PubMed ID: 34657765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review.
    Carey SL; Lura DJ; Highsmith MJ; ;
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 26230500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results.
    Kerver N; van Twillert S; Maas B; van der Sluis CK
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234342. PubMed ID: 32603326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pattern recognition and direct control home use of a multi-articulating hand prosthesis.
    Simon AM; Turner KL; Miller LA; Hargrove LJ; Kuiken TA
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():386-391. PubMed ID: 31374660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards assessing the preferred usage features of upper limb prostheses: most important items regarding prosthesis use in people with major unilateral upper limb absence-a Dutch national survey.
    Kerver N; van der Sluis CK; van Twillert S; Krabbe PFM
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 44(24):7554-7565. PubMed ID: 34813394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voluntary phantom hand and finger movements in transhumerai amputees could be used to naturally control polydigital prostheses.
    Jarrasse N; Nicol C; Richer F; Touillet A; Martinet N; Paysant J; De Graaf JB
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1239-1245. PubMed ID: 28813991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Outperforms Direct Control for Transhumeral Amputees with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Hargrove LJ; Miller LA; Turner K; Kuiken TA
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13840. PubMed ID: 29062019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K; Fantini C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 23902465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Getting a Grip on the Impact of Incidental Feedback From Body-Powered and Myoelectric Prostheses.
    Gonzalez MA; Lee C; Kang J; Gillespie RB; Gates DH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():1905-1912. PubMed ID: 34516377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Economic evaluation of upper limb prostheses in the Netherlands including the cost-effectiveness of multi-grip versus standard myoelectric hand prostheses.
    Kerver N; Karssies E; Krabbe PFM; van der Sluis CK; Groen H
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Dec; 45(25):4311-4321. PubMed ID: 36533430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Silicone roll-on suspension for upper limb prostheses: users' views.
    Gaber TA; Gardner CM; Kirker SG
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2001 Aug; 25(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 11573878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skill assessment in upper limb myoelectric prosthesis users: Validation of a clinically feasible method for characterising upper limb temporal and amplitude variability during the performance of functional tasks.
    Thies SB; Kenney LP; Sobuh M; Galpin A; Kyberd P; Stine R; Major MJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():137-143. PubMed ID: 28684214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. User experience of controlling the DEKA Arm with EMG pattern recognition.
    Resnik LJ; Acluche F; Lieberman Klinger S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203987. PubMed ID: 30240420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis.
    Thomas N; Ung G; McGarvey C; Brown JD
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 16(1):70. PubMed ID: 31186005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees.
    Kejlaa GH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 8134275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EMG pattern recognition compared to foot control of the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik LJ; Acluche F; Borgia M; Cancio J; Latlief G; Phillips S; Sasson N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204854. PubMed ID: 30335781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.