190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31466063)
1. DNA Ploidy Analysis and Cell Block Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis of Malignant Effusions.
Puri M; Sen R; Gupta M; Kalra R; Bhargava S; Puri K
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(3):256-264. PubMed ID: 31466063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of DNA flow cytometry and immunocytochemical analysis in diagnosis of malignant effusions.
Kundu R; Handa U; Mohan H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Oct; 40(10):887-92. PubMed ID: 21485027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of DNA flow cytometry and image cytometry on effusion fluid.
Saha I; Dey P; Vhora H; Nijhawan R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10649516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of nucleolar organiser regions and DNA flow cytometry in the evaluation of pleural effusion.
Huang MS; Tsai MS; Hwang JJ; Wang TH
Thorax; 1994 Nov; 49(11):1152-6. PubMed ID: 7831633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of multicolour flow cytometry in the detection of metastatic carcinoma in serous effusions: Special emphasis in atypical cytology.
Sahu S; Gupta P; Susheilia S; Gautam U; Dey P
Cytopathology; 2021 Mar; 32(2):169-179. PubMed ID: 33040400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Serous effusions in malignant lymphomas: a review.
Das DK
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 May; 34(5):335-47. PubMed ID: 16604559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytology and flow cytometry of malignant effusions of multiple myeloma.
Palmer HE; Wilson CS; Bardales RH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Mar; 22(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 10679993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of DNA flow cytometric analysis of body cavity fluids with conventional cytology.
Lima CE; Mizushima Y; Masuda S; Kitagawa M
In Vivo; 1994; 8(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 7803718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Value of the EZH2 Immunomarker in Malignant Effusion Cytology.
Ang PP; Tan GC; Karim N; Wong YP
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(3):248-255. PubMed ID: 31352449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benign and malignant cells in effusions: diagnostic value of image DNA cytometry in comparison to cytological analysis.
Decker D; Stratmann H; Springer W; Schwering H; Varnai N; Bollmann R
Pathol Res Pract; 1998; 194(11):791-5. PubMed ID: 9842638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymphoreticular malignancies in serous effusions: Cytomorphologic, flow cytometric and immunocytochemical analysis.
Gupta P; Pandey T; Gautam U; Rajwanshi A; Srinivasan R; Gupta N; Rohilla M; Varma N; Dey P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 May; 49(5):647-656. PubMed ID: 33629825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic value of DNA analysis in effusions by flow cytometry and image analysis. A prospective study on 102 patients as compared with cytologic examination.
Rijken A; Dekker A; Taylor S; Hoffman P; Blank M; Krause JR
Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Jan; 95(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 1987753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of immunohistochemistry staining and cytologic diagnosis by using cell block sections prepared with effusion fluid cytology specimens].
Mao YY; Yang M; Liu DG; Lin MH; Zhang LQ; Chen ZQ
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 38(8):547-50. PubMed ID: 20021967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiparameter flow cytometric DNA analysis of effusions: a prospective study of 36 cases compared with routine cytology and immunohistochemistry.
Joseph MG; Banerjee D; Harris P; Gibson S; McFadden RG
Mod Pathol; 1995 Aug; 8(6):686-93. PubMed ID: 8532707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA flow cytometry of pleural effusions. Comparison with pathology for the diagnosis of malignancy.
Evans DA; Thornthwaite JT; Ng AB; Sugarbaker EV
Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Mar; 5(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 6846965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of diagnostic value of cytological smear method versus cell block method in body fluid cytology: study of 150 cases.
Bhanvadia VM; Santwani PM; Vachhani JH
Ethiop J Health Sci; 2014 Apr; 24(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 24795513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Malignant mesothelioma: immunohistochemistry and DNA ploidy analysis as methods to differentiate mesothelioma from benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation and adenocarcinoma in pleural and peritoneal effusions.
Friedman MT; Gentile P; Tarectecan A; Fuchs A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Oct; 120(10):959-66. PubMed ID: 12046609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simplified flow cytometric immunophenotyping procedure for the diagnosis of effusions caused by epithelial malignancies.
Pillai V; Cibas ES; Dorfman DM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 May; 139(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 23596119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of conventional cytology, immunocytochemistry, and flow cytometric DNA ploidy in the evaluation of body cavity fluids: a prospective study of 52 patients.
Chen LM; Lazcano O; Katzmann JA; Kimlinger TK; Li CY
Am J Clin Pathol; 1998 Jun; 109(6):712-21. PubMed ID: 9620028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Static DNA cytometry as a diagnostic aid in effusion cytology: II. DNA aneuploidy for identification of neoplastic cells in equivocal effusions.
Motherby H; Nadjari B; Remmerbach T; Marcy T; Pomjanskaja N; Müller W; Knops K; Häussinger D; Strauer BE; Böcking A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1998 Jun; 20(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 9642442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
