234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31466466)
1. Early Diagnosis of Keratoconus in Chinese Myopic Eyes by Combining Corvis ST with Pentacam.
Zhang M; Zhang F; Li Y; Song Y; Wang Z
Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):118-123. PubMed ID: 31466466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes.
Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V
J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection.
Ambrósio R; Lopes BT; Faria-Correia F; Salomão MQ; Bühren J; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P
J Refract Surg; 2017 Jul; 33(7):434-443. PubMed ID: 28681902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of Scheimpflug-derived corneal biomechanical and tomographic indices for detecting subclinical and mild keratectasia in a South Asian population.
Kataria P; Padmanabhan P; Gopalakrishnan A; Padmanaban V; Mahadik S; Ambrósio R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Mar; 45(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 30527442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia and Corvis ST parameters for subclinical keratoconus.
Song Y; Feng Y; Qu M; Ma Q; Tian H; Li D; He R
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 43(5):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 36255612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients.
Liu Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):339. PubMed ID: 34544392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Assessment of corneal biomechanical changes after small incision lenticule extraction with Pentacam and Corvis ST].
Zhang MY; Zhang FJ; Song YZ; Zhao Q; Zhang Y; Yang WL; Zhai CB
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 56(2):103-109. PubMed ID: 32074820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Corneal Tomography and a New Combined Tomographic Biomechanical Index in Subclinical Keratoconus.
Chan TCY; Wang YM; Yu M; Jhanji V
J Refract Surg; 2018 Sep; 34(9):616-621. PubMed ID: 30199566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Ectasia Detection in Early Keratoconus Using Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments.
Wallace HB; Vellara HR; Gokul A; McGhee CNJ; Meyer JJ
Cornea; 2023 Dec; 42(12):1528-1535. PubMed ID: 36973879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the morphological and biomechanical characteristics of keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal corneas.
Guo LL; Tian L; Cao K; Li YX; Li N; Yang WQ; Jie Y
Semin Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 36(8):671-678. PubMed ID: 33734947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of Subclinical Corneal Ectasia Using Corneal Tomographic and Biomechanical Assessments in a Japanese Population.
Koh S; Ambrósio R; Inoue R; Maeda N; Miki A; Nishida K
J Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 35(6):383-390. PubMed ID: 31185104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of CorvisST biomechanical parameters and anterior segment optical coherence tomography for diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus.
Shiga S; Kojima T; Nishida T; Nakamura T; Ichikawa K
Acta Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 99(6):644-651. PubMed ID: 33326180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tomographic and Biomechanical Scheimpflug Imaging for Keratoconus Characterization: A Validation of Current Indices.
Steinberg J; Siebert M; Katz T; Frings A; Mehlan J; Druchkiv V; Bühren J; Linke SJ
J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 34(12):840-847. PubMed ID: 30540367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhanced Combined Tomography and Biomechanics Data for Distinguishing Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
Luz A; Lopes B; Hallahan KM; Valbon B; Ramos I; Faria-Correia F; Schor P; Dupps WJ; Ambrósio R
J Refract Surg; 2016 Jul; 32(7):479-94. PubMed ID: 27400080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal biomechanical properties and anterior segment parameters in forme fruste keratoconus.
Kozobolis V; Sideroudi H; Giarmoukakis A; Gkika M; Labiris G
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(6):920-30. PubMed ID: 22865401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
Nishida T; Kojima T; Kataoka T; Isogai N; Yoshida Y; Nakamura T
Ophthalmic Res; 2020; 63(6):541-549. PubMed ID: 32106114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical Analysis of Tomographically Regular Keratoconus Fellow Eyes Using Corvis ST.
Augustin VA; Son HS; Kovalchuk B; Yildirim TM; Köppe MK; Auffarth GU; Khoramnia R
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2023 Aug; 240(8):944-951. PubMed ID: 37567232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus.
Awad EA; Abou Samra WA; Torky MA; El-Kannishy AM
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):186. PubMed ID: 28985735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical Evaluation of Topographically and Tomographically Normal Fellow Eyes of Patients With Keratoconus.
Asroui L; Dagher SA; Elsheikh A; Lopes BT; Roberts CJ; Assouad M; Awwad ST
J Refract Surg; 2022 May; 38(5):318-325. PubMed ID: 35536713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
