BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31466930)

  • 1. Comparison of transverse maxillary dental arch width changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets in patients requiring premolar extraction - A randomised clinical trial.
    Bashir R; Sonar S; Batra P; Srivastava A; Singla A
    Int Orthod; 2019 Dec; 17(4):687-692. PubMed ID: 31466930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative assessment of dental and basal arch dimensions of passive and active self-ligating versus conventional appliances : A randomized clinical trial.
    Alabdullah MM; Burhan AS; Nabawia A; Nawaya F; Saltaji H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Apr; 84(Suppl 2):74-83. PubMed ID: 35788397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of transverse dimensional and incisor changes between wide and narrow orthodontic archwires: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ahmed AS; Al-Nimri KS; Ahmed WS
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):338. PubMed ID: 38797781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of maxillary arch dimensional and inclination changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets using broad archwires.
    Atik E; Akarsu-Guven B; Kocadereli I; Ciger S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jun; 149(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 27241993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
    Fleming PS; Lee RT; Marinho V; Johal A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 23910199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
    Fleming PS; Lee RT; Mcdonald T; Pandis N; Johal A
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24269833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficiency of self-ligating vs conventionally ligated brackets during initial alignment.
    Ong E; McCallum H; Griffin MP; Ho C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):138.e1-7; discussion 138-9. PubMed ID: 20691348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional digital cast analysis of the effects produced by a passive self-ligating system.
    Lineberger MB; Franchi L; Cevidanes LH; Huanca Ghislanzoni LT; McNamara JA
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):609-614. PubMed ID: 26843516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transverse and torque dental changes after passive self-ligating fixed therapy: A two-year follow-up study.
    Lucchese A; Manuelli M; Albertini P; Ghislanzoni LH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jul; 156(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 31256848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e99-e105. PubMed ID: 21889063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.
    Almeida MR; Futagami C; Conti AC; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro Rde L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):50-7. PubMed ID: 26154456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finishing effectiveness of different archwires using SmartClip™ self-ligating brackets: a clinical study.
    Ferrari S; Bellincampi M; Sfondrini MF; Caprioglio A; Gandini P
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 24456630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of rate of orthodontic tooth movement in adolescent patients undergoing treatment by first bicuspid extraction and en-mass retraction, associated with low level laser therapy in passive self-ligating and conventional brackets: A randomized controlled trial.
    Lalnunpuii H; Batra P; Sharma K; Srivastava A; Raghavan S
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):412-423. PubMed ID: 32571649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study.
    da Costa Monini A; Júnior LG; Martins RP; Vianna AP
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maxillary dental arch changes following the leveling and alignment stage with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances: a preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial.
    Khattab TZ; Hajeer MY; Farah H; Al-Sabbagh R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Sep; 15(5):561-6. PubMed ID: 25707826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maxillary arch width changes during orthodontic treatment with fixed self-ligating and traditional straight-wire appliances.
    Tecco S; Tetè S; Perillo L; Chimenti C; Festa F
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 20072744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models.
    Cattaneo PM; Treccani M; Carlsson K; Thorgeirsson T; Myrda A; Cevidanes LH; Melsen B
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 22008302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.