These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31467471)

  • 1. Adults' Perceptions of Children's Referentially Ambiguous Responses.
    Wylie BE; Lyon TD; O'Connor AM; Lapytskaia C; Evans AD
    Psychol Crime Law; 2019; 25(7):729-738. PubMed ID: 31467471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pragmatic Failure and Referential Ambiguity when Attorneys Ask Child Witnesses "Do You Know/Remember" Questions.
    Evans AD; Stolzenberg SN; Lyon TD
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 2017 May; 23(2):191-199. PubMed ID: 28652686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do adults and children process referentially ambiguous pronouns?
    Sekerina IA; Stromswold K; Hestvik A
    J Child Lang; 2004 Feb; 31(1):123-52. PubMed ID: 15053087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interviewing preschoolers: comparisons of yes/no and wh- questions.
    Peterson C; Dowden C; Tobin J
    Law Hum Behav; 1999 Oct; 23(5):539-55. PubMed ID: 10487148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Young children's difficulty with indirect speech acts: implications for questioning child witnesses.
    Evans AD; Stolzenberg SN; Lee K; Lyon TD
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):775-88. PubMed ID: 25393547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relations between Attorney Temporal Structure and Children's Response Productivity in Cases of Alleged Child Sexual Abuse.
    Klemfuss JZ; Cleveland KC; Quas JA; Lyon TD
    Legal Criminol Psychol; 2017 Sep; 22(2):228-241. PubMed ID: 29062265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Children's referential communication skills: The role of cognitive abilities and adult models of speech.
    Uzundag BA; Küntay AC
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():73-95. PubMed ID: 29602030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Helping children correctly say "I don't know" to unanswerable questions.
    Waterman AH; Blades M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Dec; 17(4):396-405. PubMed ID: 22059954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ask versus tell: Potential confusion when child witnesses are questioned about conversations.
    Stolzenberg SN; McWilliams K; Lyon TD
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):447-459. PubMed ID: 28845997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nearly 4 years after an event: children's eyewitness memory and adults' perceptions of children's accuracy.
    Goodman GS; Batterman-Faunce JM; Schaaf JM; Kenney R
    Child Abuse Negl; 2002 Aug; 26(8):849-84. PubMed ID: 12363335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do Jurors Get What They Expect? Traditional versus Alternative Forms of Children's Testimony.
    McAuliff BD; Kovera MB
    Psychol Crime Law; 2012 Jan; 18(1):27-47. PubMed ID: 22523466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do jurors "know" what isn't so about child witnesses?
    Quas JA; Thompson WC; Alison K; Stewart C
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):425-56. PubMed ID: 16133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Knowing that you don't know: metamemory and discourse processing.
    Klin CM; Guzmán AE; Levine WH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Nov; 23(6):1378-93. PubMed ID: 9372606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children.
    Earhart B; La Rooy DJ; Brubacher SP; Lamb ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):746-61. PubMed ID: 25424612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Elaborations and Denials in Children's Responses to Yes-No Any/Some Questions in Forensic Interviews.
    Szojka ZA; Henderson HM; Hur J; Siepmann H; Lyon TD
    Child Maltreat; 2023 Aug; 28(3):407-416. PubMed ID: 36724093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of the putative confession instruction on perceptions of children's true and false statements.
    Gongola J; Scurich N; Lyon TD
    Appl Cogn Psychol; 2019; 33(4):655-661. PubMed ID: 33574640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Who are you talking about? Tracking discourse-level referential processing with event-related brain potentials.
    Nieuwland MS; Otten M; Van Berkum JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 19(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 17280512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adults' Insensitivity to Developmental Changes in Children's Ability to Report When and How Many Times Abuse Occurred.
    Cleveland KC; Quas JA
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):126-38. PubMed ID: 26918951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lexical and referential cues to sentence interpretation: an investigation of children's interpretations of ambiguous sentences.
    Kidd E; Bavin EL
    J Child Lang; 2005 Nov; 32(4):855-76. PubMed ID: 16429714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adults' judgments of children's coached reports.
    Talwar V; Lee K; Bala N; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):561-70. PubMed ID: 16941237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.