These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31467801)

  • 1. The Impact of Parenthetical Phrases on Interviewers' and Respondents' Processing of Survey Questions.
    Dykema J; Cyffka K; Banghart M; Nordheim EV; Garbaski D; Schaeffer NC
    Surv Pract; 2016; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 31467801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors Associated with Interviewers' Evaluations of Respondents' Performance in Telephone Interviews: Behavior, Response Quality Indicators, and Characteristics of Respondents and Interviewers.
    Garbarski D; Dykema J; Schaeffer NC; Jones CP; Neman TS; Edwards DF
    Public Opin Q; 2023; 87(Suppl 1):480-506. PubMed ID: 37705920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reading Fast, Reading Slow: The Effect of Interviewers' Speed in Reading Introductory Texts on Response Behavior.
    Bergmann M; Bristle J
    J Surv Stat Methodol; 2020 Apr; 8(2):325-351. PubMed ID: 32309460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interviewers' Ratings of Respondents' Health: Predictors and Association With Mortality.
    Garbarski D; Schaeffer NC; Dykema J
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2019 Sep; 74(7):1213-1221. PubMed ID: 29220523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Logical inconsistencies in time trade-off valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states: Whose fault is it?
    Yang Z; van Busschbach J; Timman R; Janssen MF; Luo N
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184883. PubMed ID: 28934266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interviewer effects on abortion reporting: a multilevel analysis of household survey responses in Côte d'Ivoire, Nigeria and Rajasthan, India.
    Footman K
    BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e047570. PubMed ID: 34799361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do interviewers' health beliefs and habits modify responses to sensitive questions? A study using data Collected from pregnant women by means of computer-assisted telephone interviews.
    Nybo Andersen AM; Olsen J
    Am J Epidemiol; 2002 Jan; 155(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 11772790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interviewers' and respondents' effects on self-reported alcohol consumption in a Swiss health survey.
    Heeb JL; Gmel G
    J Stud Alcohol; 2001 Jul; 62(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 11513221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of interviewers' supportive comments and children's reluctance to cooperate during sexual abuse disclosure.
    Lewy J; Cyr M; Dion J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2015 May; 43():112-22. PubMed ID: 25816755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of the sex of interviewers on the quality of data in a Nigerian family planning questionnaire.
    Becker S; Feyisetan K; Makinwa-Adebusoye P
    Stud Fam Plann; 1995; 26(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 7482680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Behind the Scenes: A Qualitative Investigation of Interviewers' Performance in EQ-5D Valuation Studies.
    Varriale C; Andrulli G; Meregaglia M; Rencz F; Finch AP
    Pharmacoecon Open; 2024 May; 8(3):389-401. PubMed ID: 38592657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do interviewer attitudes to data linkage influence respondents' consent to linkage? Analysis of Understanding Society.
    Patterson L; Cruise SM; Cardwell CR; O'Reilly D
    Eur J Public Health; 2021 Feb; 31(1):221-226. PubMed ID: 33529324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interviewer and Respondent Interactions and Quality Assessments in a Time Diary Study.
    Freedman VA; Broome J; Conrad F; Cornman JC
    Electron Int J Time Use Res; 2013 Nov; 10(1):55-75. PubMed ID: 24729796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in Zambia.
    Harling G; Chanda MM; Ortblad KF; Mwale M; Chongo S; Kanchele C; Kamungoma N; Barresi LG; Bärnighausen T; Oldenburg CE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):60. PubMed ID: 30876402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strangers in the Field: A Methodological Experiment on Interviewer-Respondent Familiarity.
    Weinreb A; Sana M; Stecklov G
    Bull Methodol Sociol; 2018; 137-138(1):94-119. PubMed ID: 37502739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What They Expect Is What You Get: The Role of Interviewer Expectations in Nonresponse to Income and Asset Questions.
    Friedel S
    J Surv Stat Methodol; 2020 Nov; 8(5):851-876. PubMed ID: 33381608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. You Know What I Know: Interviewer Knowledge Effects in Subjective Expectation Elicitation.
    Kerwin JT; Ordaz Reynoso N
    Demography; 2021 Feb; 58(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 33834250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The contributions of paradata and features of respondents, interviewers and survey agencies to panel co-operation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe.
    Bristle J; Celidoni M; Bianco CD; Weber G
    J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc; 2019 Jan; 182(1):3-35. PubMed ID: 31439985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interviewer effects in public health surveys.
    Davis RE; Couper MP; Janz NK; Caldwell CH; Resnicow K
    Health Educ Res; 2010 Feb; 25(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 19762354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The time it takes to reveal embarrassing information in a mobile phone survey.
    Fail S; Schober MF; Conrad FG
    Int J Soc Res Methodol; 2021; 24(2):249-364. PubMed ID: 33732090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.