322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31469023)
21. Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee.
Hafner BJ; Willingham LL; Buell NC; Allyn KJ; Smith DG
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 17270519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Functional assessment and satisfaction of transfemoral amputees with low mobility (FASTK2): A clinical trial of microprocessor-controlled vs. non-microprocessor-controlled knees.
Kaufman KR; Bernhardt KA; Symms K
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Oct; 58():116-122. PubMed ID: 30077128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Transfemoral amputee intact limb loading and compensatory gait mechanics during down slope ambulation and the effect of prosthetic knee mechanisms.
Morgenroth DC; Roland M; Pruziner AL; Czerniecki JM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Jun; 55():65-72. PubMed ID: 29698851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Survey of transfemoral amputee experience and priorities for the user-centered design of powered robotic transfemoral prostheses.
Fanciullacci C; McKinney Z; Monaco V; Milandri G; Davalli A; Sacchetti R; Laffranchi M; De Michieli L; Baldoni A; Mazzoni A; Paternò L; Rosini E; Reale L; Trecate F; Crea S; Vitiello N; Gruppioni E
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Dec; 18(1):168. PubMed ID: 34863213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the microprocessor-controlled knee C-Leg in transfemoral amputees with and without diabetes mellitus.
Kuhlmann A; Krüger H; Seidinger S; Hahn A
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Apr; 21(3):437-449. PubMed ID: 31897813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Gait and balance of transfemoral amputees using passive mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.
Kaufman KR; Levine JA; Brey RH; Iverson BK; McCrady SK; Padgett DJ; Joyner MJ
Gait Posture; 2007 Oct; 26(4):489-93. PubMed ID: 17869114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of a stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on level walking in lower functioning individuals with a transfemoral amputation.
Eberly VJ; Mulroy SJ; Gronley JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Burnfield JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 24135259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Perceived self-efficacy and specific self-reported outcomes in persons with lower-limb amputation using a non-microprocessor-controlled versus a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee.
Möller S; Hagberg K; Samulesson K; Ramstrand N
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Apr; 13(3):220-225. PubMed ID: 28366038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of mobility and user satisfaction between a microprocessor knee and a standard prosthetic knee: a summary of seven single-subject trials.
Howard CL; Wallace C; Perry B; Stokic DS
Int J Rehabil Res; 2018 Mar; 41(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 29293160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees on self-reported mobility, quality of life, and psychological states in patients with transfemoral amputations.
Şen Eİ; Aydın T; Buğdaycı D; Kesiktaş FN
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2020 Sep; 54(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 33155559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Gait termination on a declined surface in trans-femoral amputees: Impact of using microprocessor-controlled limb system.
Abdulhasan ZM; Scally AJ; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Aug; 57():35-41. PubMed ID: 29908391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative biomechanical analysis of current microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints.
Bellmann M; Schmalz T; Blumentritt S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 91(4):644-52. PubMed ID: 20382300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can microprocessor knees reduce the disparity in trips and falls risks between above and below knee prosthesis users?
McGrath M; Gray LA; Rek B; Davies KC; Savage Z; McLean J; Stenson A; Zahedi S
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0271315. PubMed ID: 36054087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. First results concerning the safety, walking, and satisfaction with an innovative, microprocessor-controlled four-axes prosthetic foot.
Hahn A; Sreckovic I; Reiter S; Mileusnic M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Jun; 42(3):350-356. PubMed ID: 29400252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative biomechanical evaluation of two technologically different microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints in safety-relevant daily-life situations.
Bellmann M; Köhler TM; Schmalz T
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2019 Aug; 64(4):407-420. PubMed ID: 30540556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee affect stair ascent strategies in persons with transfemoral amputation?
Aldridge Whitehead JM; Wolf EJ; Scoville CR; Wilken JM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Oct; 472(10):3093-101. PubMed ID: 24515402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impacts of Microprocessor-Controlled Versus Non-microprocessor-Controlled Prosthetic Knee Joints Among Transfemoral Amputees on Functional Outcomes: A Comparative Study.
Alzeer AM; Bhaskar Raj N; Shahine EM; Nadiah WA
Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24331. PubMed ID: 35607529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of advanced prosthetic knee joints on perceived performance and everyday life activity level of low-functional persons with a transfemoral amputation or knee disarticulation.
Theeven PJ; Hemmen B; Geers RP; Smeets RJ; Brink PR; Seelen HA
J Rehabil Med; 2012 May; 44(5):454-61. PubMed ID: 22549656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on ramp negotiation and community walking function in K2 level transfemoral amputees.
Burnfield JM; Eberly VJ; Gronely JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Mulroy SJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Mar; 36(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 22223685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Kenevo microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee compared with non-microprocessor-controlled knees in individuals older than 65 years in Sweden: A cost-effectiveness and budget-impact analysis.
Kuhlmann A; Hagberg K; Kamrad I; Ramstrand N; Seidinger S; Berg H
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Oct; 46(5):414-424. PubMed ID: 35511441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
