392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31469105)
1. Breast phantoms for 2D digital mammography with realistic anatomical structures and attenuation characteristics based on clinical images using 3D printing.
Schopphoven S; Cavael P; Bock K; Fiebich M; Mäder U
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(21):215005. PubMed ID: 31469105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel physical anthropomorphic breast phantom for 2D and 3D x-ray imaging.
Ikejimba LC; Graff CG; Rosenthal S; Badal A; Ghammraoui B; Lo JY; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):407-416. PubMed ID: 27992059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A four-alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet-printed anthropomorphic phantom.
Ikejimba LC; Salad J; Graff CG; Ghammraoui B; Cheng WC; Lo JY; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3883-3892. PubMed ID: 31135960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fabrication of 3D printed patient-derived anthropomorphic breast phantoms for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Imaging assessment with clinical X-ray spectra.
Varallo A; Sarno A; Castriconi R; Mazzilli A; Loria A; Del Vecchio A; Orientale A; Pilotti IAM; D'Andria P; Bliznakova K; Ricciardi R; Mettivier G; Russo P
Phys Med; 2022 Jun; 98():88-97. PubMed ID: 35526373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
Liu X; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Geiser WR; Shen Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6489-501. PubMed ID: 22149832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How does c-view image quality compare with conventional 2D FFDM?
Nelson JS; Wells JR; Baker JA; Samei E
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2538. PubMed ID: 27147364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a neonate X-ray phantom for 2D imaging applications using single-tone inkjet printing.
Cruz-Bastida JP; Marshall EL; Reiser N; George J; Pearson EA; Feinstein KA; Al-Hallaq HA; Burton CS; Beaulieu D; MacDougall RD; Reiser I
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):4944-4954. PubMed ID: 34255871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calibrated breast density methods for full field digital mammography: a system for serial quality control and inter-system generalization.
Lu B; Smallwood AM; Sellers TA; Drukteinis JS; Heine JJ; Fowler EE
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):623-36. PubMed ID: 25652480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional printing of patient-specific lung phantoms for CT imaging: Emulating lung tissue with accurate attenuation profiles and textures.
Mei K; Geagan M; Roshkovan L; Litt HI; Gang GJ; Shapira N; Stayman JW; Noël PB
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):825-835. PubMed ID: 34910309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of task-based performance from five clinical DBT systems using an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
Ikejimba LC; Salad J; Graff CG; Goodsitt M; Chan HP; Huang H; Zhao W; Ghammraoui B; Lo JY; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1026-1038. PubMed ID: 33128288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing task performance in FFDM, DBT, and synthetic mammography using uniform and anthropomorphic physical phantoms.
Ikejimba LC; Glick SJ; Choudhury KR; Samei E; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5593. PubMed ID: 27782687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suitability of low density materials for 3D printing of physical breast phantoms.
Ivanov D; Bliznakova K; Buliev I; Popov P; Mettivier G; Russo P; Di Lillo F; Sarno A; Vignero J; Bosmans H; Bravin A; Bliznakov Z
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(17):175020. PubMed ID: 29999497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of 3D printing techniques: Toward patient specific quality assurance spine-shaped phantom for stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Kim MJ; Lee SR; Lee MY; Sohn JW; Yun HG; Choi JY; Jeon SW; Suh TS
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176227. PubMed ID: 28472175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thermoplastic 3D printing technology using a single filament for producing realistic patient-derived breast models.
Dukov N; Bliznakova K; Okkalidis N; Teneva T; Encheva E; Bliznakov Z
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(4):. PubMed ID: 35038693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of Using Accreditation Phantom in Quality Control of Digital Tomosynthesis.
Al Khalifah K; Brindabhan A; Mathew M; Davidson R
J Allied Health; 2019; 48(1):e15-e19. PubMed ID: 30826837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the attenuation of metal-infused filaments for 3D printing a gamma camera calibration phantom.
Beckmann J; Popovic K
Med Eng Phys; 2020 Jun; 80():60-64. PubMed ID: 32446758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of realistic physical breast phantoms matched to virtual breast phantoms based on human subject data.
Kiarashi N; Nolte AC; Sturgeon GM; Segars WP; Ghate SV; Nolte LW; Samei E; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4116-26. PubMed ID: 26133612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monte-Carlo simulation of a slot-scanning digital mammography system for tomosynthesis.
Kulkarni M; Dendere R; Nicolls F; Douglas TS
J Xray Sci Technol; 2016; 24(2):191-206. PubMed ID: 27002901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
