184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31469193)
1. Introducing a time out consultation with the general practitioner between diagnosis and start of colorectal cancer treatment: Patient-reported outcomes.
Wieldraaijer T; de Meij M; Zwaard S; van Weert H; Wind J
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 Nov; 28(6):e13141. PubMed ID: 31469193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomised controlled trial protocol (GRIP study): examining the effect of involvement of a general practitioner and home care oncology nurse after a cancer diagnosis on patient reported outcomes and healthcare utilization.
Perfors IAA; Helsper CW; Noteboom EA; van der Wall E; de Wit NJ; May AM
BMC Cancer; 2018 Feb; 18(1):132. PubMed ID: 29402234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The first consultation for low mood in general practice: what do patients find helpful?
Morgan I; Dowrick C; Macdonald S; Wilkes S; Watson S
Fam Pract; 2024 Jun; 41(3):333-339. PubMed ID: 36827089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is three a crowd? Impact of the presence of a medical student in the general practice consultation.
Partanen R; Ranmuthugala G; Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S; van Driel M
Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 50(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 26813001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. General Practitioners' Empathy and Health Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study of Consultations in Areas of High and Low Deprivation.
Mercer SW; Higgins M; Bikker AM; Fitzpatrick B; McConnachie A; Lloyd SM; Little P; Watt GC
Ann Fam Med; 2016 Mar; 14(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 26951586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient experiences and the association with organizational factors in general practice: results from the Norwegian part of the international, multi-centre, cross-sectional QUALICOPC study.
Eide TB; Straand J; Melbye H; Rortveit G; Hetlevik I; Rosvold EO
BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Aug; 16(1):428. PubMed ID: 27553244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colorectal cancer management - the role of the GP.
Hanks H; Veitch C; Harris M
Aust Fam Physician; 2008 Apr; 37(4):259-61. PubMed ID: 18398525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What do patients bring up in consultations? An observational study in general practice.
Bjørland E; Brekke M
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2015; 33(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 26205343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomised controlled trial of a repeated consultation support intervention for patients with colorectal cancer.
Shepherd SC; Hacking B; Wallace LM; Murdoch SE; Belkora J
Psychooncology; 2019 Apr; 28(4):702-709. PubMed ID: 30548890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Symptoms as the main problem: a cross- sectional study of patient experience in primary care.
Rosendal M; Carlsen AH; Rask MT
BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Mar; 17():29. PubMed ID: 26965443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences between GP perception of delivered empathy and patient-perceived empathy: a cross-sectional study in primary care.
Hermans L; Olde Hartman TC; Dielissen PW
Br J Gen Pract; 2018 Sep; 68(674):e621-e626. PubMed ID: 30012809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased primary health care use in the first year after colorectal cancer diagnosis.
Brandenbarg D; Roorda C; Groenhof F; Havenga K; Berger MY; de Bock GH; Berendsen AJ
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2014 Jun; 32(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 24931639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving GP communication in consultations on medically unexplained symptoms: a qualitative interview study with patients in primary care.
Houwen J; Lucassen PL; Stappers HW; Assendelft WJ; van Dulmen S; Olde Hartman TC
Br J Gen Pract; 2017 Oct; 67(663):e716-e723. PubMed ID: 28847774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Structured follow-up by general practitioners after deliberate self-poisoning: a randomised controlled trial.
Grimholt TK; Jacobsen D; Haavet OR; Sandvik L; Jorgensen T; Norheim AB; Ekeberg O
BMC Psychiatry; 2015 Oct; 15():245. PubMed ID: 26467530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient consultation rate and clinical and NHS outcomes: a cross-sectional analysis of English primary care data from 2.7 million patients in 238 practices.
Lay-Flurrie S; Mathieu E; Bankhead C; Nicholson BD; Perera-Salazar R; Holt T; Hobbs FDR; Salisbury C;
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Apr; 19(1):219. PubMed ID: 30954074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do cancer patients benefit from short-term contact with a general practitioner following cancer treatment? A randomised, controlled study.
Holtedahl K; Norum J; Anvik T; Richardsen E
Support Care Cancer; 2005 Nov; 13(11):949-56. PubMed ID: 16025260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patients' experiences of referral for colorectal cancer.
Pascoe SW; Veitch C; Crossland LJ; Beilby JJ; Spigelman A; Stubbs J; Harris MF;
BMC Fam Pract; 2013 Aug; 14():124. PubMed ID: 23972115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are patients' preferences regarding the place of treatment heard and addressed at the point of referral: an exploratory study based on observations of GP-patient consultations.
Victoor A; Noordman J; Sonderkamp JA; Delnoij DM; Friele RD; van Dulmen S; Rademakers JJ
BMC Fam Pract; 2013 Dec; 14():189. PubMed ID: 24325155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of a telephone-first consultation system in general practice.
Miller D; Loftus AM; O'Boyle PJ; McCloskey M; O'Kelly J; Mace D; McKeon N; Ewan SL; Moore L; Abbott A; Cunning S; McCarron MO; Paget AM
Postgrad Med J; 2019 Nov; 95(1129):590-595. PubMed ID: 31326942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structure and content in consultations with patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.
Carlsson E; Pettersson M; Hydén LC; Öhlén J; Friberg F
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2013 Dec; 17(6):820-6. PubMed ID: 24012188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
