305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31469289)
21. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of low-dose paranasal sinus CT imaging using a new deep learning image reconstruction technique in children compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASiR-V).
Li Y; Liu X; Zhuang XH; Wang MJ; Song XF
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Jun; 22(1):106. PubMed ID: 35658908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Low-dose MDCT and CT enterography of patients with Crohn disease: feasibility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Kambadakone AR; Chaudhary NA; Desai GS; Nguyen DD; Kulkarni NM; Sahani DV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):W743-52. PubMed ID: 21606263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The combination of a reduction in contrast agent dose with low tube voltage and an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm in CT enterography: Effects on image quality and radiation dose.
Feng C; Zhu D; Zou X; Li A; Hu X; Li Z; Hu D
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Mar; 97(12):e0151. PubMed ID: 29561422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of deep learning image reconstruction on volumetric accuracy and image quality of pulmonary nodules with different morphologies in low-dose CT.
D'hondt L; Franck C; Kellens PJ; Zanca F; Buytaert D; Van Hoyweghen A; Addouli HE; Carpentier K; Niekel M; Spinhoven M; Bacher K; Snoeckx A
Cancer Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):60. PubMed ID: 38720391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Application of deep learning image reconstruction in low-dose chest CT scan.
Wang H; Li LL; Shang J; Song J; Liu B
Br J Radiol; 2022 May; 95(1133):20210380. PubMed ID: 35084210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Application of a full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in 80 kVp ultra-low-dose paranasal sinus CT imaging of pediatric patients.
Sun J; Zhang Q; Duan X; Zhang C; Wang P; Jia C; Liu Y; Peng Y
Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 29019028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique on Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Bone SPECT/CT.
Sibille L; Chambert B; Alonso S; Barrau C; D'Estanque E; Al Tabaa Y; Collombier L; Demattei C; Kotzki PO; Boudousq V
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1091-5. PubMed ID: 27013695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Radiation dose reduction in soft tissue neck CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).
Vachha B; Brodoefel H; Wilcox C; Hackney DB; Moonis G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2222-6. PubMed ID: 24016832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Deep learning reconstruction for contrast-enhanced CT of the upper abdomen: similar image quality with lower radiation dose in direct comparison with iterative reconstruction.
Nam JG; Hong JH; Kim DS; Oh J; Goo JM
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5533-5543. PubMed ID: 33555354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Image quality improvement using model-based iterative reconstruction in low dose chest CT for children with necrotizing pneumonia.
Sun J; Yu T; Liu J; Duan X; Hu D; Liu Y; Peng Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Mar; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 28302073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Phantom Study of Image Noise, Spatial Resolution, Lesion Detectability, and Dose Reduction Potential.
Euler A; Solomon J; Marin D; Nelson RC; Samei E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 29702019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR).
Chen B; Barnhart H; Richard S; Robins M; Colsher J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111902. PubMed ID: 24320435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Application of a New Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Dose Upper Abdominal CT.
Jia Y; Zhai B; He T; Yu Y; Yu N; Duan H; Yang C; Zhang X
Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):e275-e283. PubMed ID: 30660470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Image quality in children with low-radiation chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction.
Sun J; Peng Y; Duan X; Yu T; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Hu D
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96045. PubMed ID: 24828429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of two deep learning-based reconstruction methods compared with an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction method for solid and ground-glass nodule volumetry on low-dose and ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography: A phantom study.
Kim C; Kwack T; Kim W; Cha J; Yang Z; Yong HS
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270122. PubMed ID: 35737734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Combining automatic tube current modulation with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for low-dose chest CT screening.
Chen JH; Jin EH; He W; Zhao LQ
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e92414. PubMed ID: 24691208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The application value of deep learning image reconstruction on improving image quality and evaluating the Qanadli embolism index of dual low-dose CT pulmonary angiography].
Qiu SM; Zhang H; Liu ZX; Zhang L; Meng YK; Sun XN; Xie LX; Zhang YC; Wang H; Xu K
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 May; 103(19):1477-1482. PubMed ID: 37198110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
