These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31469591)

  • 1. Acceptance of Full Driving Automation: Personally Owned and Shared-Use Concepts.
    Motamedi S; Wang P; Zhang T; Chan CY
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):288-309. PubMed ID: 31469591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trust in smart systems: sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars.
    Verberne FM; Ham J; Midden CJ
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):799-810. PubMed ID: 23156624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why Do I Have to Drive Now? Post Hoc Explanations of Takeover Requests.
    Körber M; Prasch L; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):305-323. PubMed ID: 29283269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Public Acceptance of Fully Automated Driving: Effects of Social Trust and Risk/Benefit Perceptions.
    Liu P; Yang R; Xu Z
    Risk Anal; 2019 Feb; 39(2):326-341. PubMed ID: 30059602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring Trust in Self-Driving Vehicles Through Text Analysis.
    Lee JD; Kolodge K
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):260-277. PubMed ID: 31502885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Challenges to Human Drivers in Increasingly Automated Vehicles.
    Hancock PA; Kajaks T; Caird JK; Chignell MH; Mizobuchi S; Burns PC; Feng J; Fernie GR; Lavallière M; Noy IY; Redelmeier DA; Vrkljan BH
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):310-328. PubMed ID: 32022583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire.
    Nordhoff S; Stapel J; He X; Gentner A; Happee R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260953. PubMed ID: 34932565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-Term Evaluation of Drivers' Behavioral Adaptation to an Adaptive Collision Avoidance System.
    Muslim H; Itoh M
    Hum Factors; 2021 Nov; 63(7):1295-1315. PubMed ID: 32484749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Influence of Feelings While Driving Regular Cars on the Perception and Acceptance of Self-Driving Cars.
    Raue M; D'Ambrosio LA; Ward C; Lee C; Jacquillat C; Coughlin JF
    Risk Anal; 2019 Feb; 39(2):358-374. PubMed ID: 30650211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems.
    Rahman MM; Lesch MF; Horrey WJ; Strawderman L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():361-373. PubMed ID: 28957759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated Driving System Collisions: Early Lessons.
    Biever W; Angell L; Seaman S
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):249-259. PubMed ID: 31502899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system.
    Itoh M; Horikome T; Inagaki T
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):756-63. PubMed ID: 23453775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
    Nees MA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():61-68. PubMed ID: 31235236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advanced vehicle technologies and road safety: A scoping review of the evidence.
    Furlan AD; Kajaks T; Tiong M; Lavallière M; Campos JL; Babineau J; Haghzare S; Ma T; Vrkljan B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Nov; 147():105741. PubMed ID: 32979820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study.
    Buckley L; Kaye SA; Pradhan AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():202-208. PubMed ID: 29631216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.
    Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. User perceptions of automated Truck-Mounted attenuators: Implications on work zone safety.
    Pourfalatoun S; Miller EE
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(5):413-418. PubMed ID: 34037505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of brand and brand trust on initial trust in fully automated driving system.
    Cui Z; Tu N; Itoh M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0284654. PubMed ID: 37141217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to assess driver's interaction with partially automated driving systems - A framework for early concept assessment.
    van den Beukel AP; van der Voort MC
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):302-312. PubMed ID: 27890141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceptance of truck platooning by professional drivers on German highways. A mixed methods approach.
    Castritius SM; Hecht H; Möller J; Dietz CJ; Schubert P; Bernhard C; Morvilius S; Haas CT; Hammer S
    Appl Ergon; 2020 May; 85():103042. PubMed ID: 31929025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.