BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31470107)

  • 1. A gate-keeping test for selecting adaptive interventions under general designs of sequential multiple assignment randomized trials.
    Zhong X; Cheng B; Qian M; Cheung YK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2019 Oct; 85():105830. PubMed ID: 31470107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-varying SMART design and data analysis methods for evaluating adaptive intervention effects.
    Dai T; Shete S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):112. PubMed ID: 27578254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SMART longitudinal analysis: A tutorial for using repeated outcome measures from SMART studies to compare adaptive interventions.
    Nahum-Shani I; Almirall D; Yap JRT; McKay JR; Lynch KG; Freiheit EA; Dziak JJ
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 31318231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing cluster-level dynamic treatment regimens using sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials: Regression estimation and sample size considerations.
    NeCamp T; Kilbourne A; Almirall D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1572-1589. PubMed ID: 28627310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
    Gu X; Lee JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian sequential design with adaptive randomization for 2-sided hypothesis test.
    Yu Q; Zhu L; Zhu H
    Pharm Stat; 2017 Nov; 16(6):451-465. PubMed ID: 28980435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design of sequentially randomized trials for testing adaptive treatment strategies.
    Ogbagaber SB; Karp J; Wahed AS
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):840-58. PubMed ID: 26412033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical Considerations and Software for Designing Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trials (SMART) with a Survival Final Endpoint.
    Kravets S; Ruppert AS; Jacobson SB; Le-Rademacher JG; Mandrekar SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):539-552. PubMed ID: 37434437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing hypotheses under adaptive randomization with continuous covariates in clinical trials.
    Li X; Zhou J; Hu F
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1609-1621. PubMed ID: 29770730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size calculations for evaluating treatment policies in multi-stage designs.
    Dawson R; Lavori PW
    Clin Trials; 2010 Dec; 7(6):643-52. PubMed ID: 20630903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions.
    Nahum-Shani I; Qian M; Almirall D; Pelham WE; Gnagy B; Fabiano GA; Waxmonsky JG; Yu J; Murphy SA
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):457-477. PubMed ID: 23025433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Data Analysis Method for Using Longitudinal Binary Outcome Data from a SMART to Compare Adaptive Interventions.
    Dziak JJ; Yap JRT; Almirall D; McKay JR; Lynch KG; Nahum-Shani I
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(5):613-636. PubMed ID: 30663401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A group sequential, response-adaptive design for randomized clinical trials.
    Karrison TG; Huo D; Chappell R
    Control Clin Trials; 2003 Oct; 24(5):506-22. PubMed ID: 14500050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A framework for testing non-inferiority in a three-arm, sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial.
    Paul E; Chakraborty B; Sikorskii A; Ghosh S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Apr; 33(4):611-633. PubMed ID: 38400576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Urn models for response-adaptive randomized designs: a simulation study based on a non-adaptive randomized trial.
    Ghiglietti A; Scarale MG; Miceli R; Ieva F; Mariani L; Gavazzi C; Paganoni AM; Edefonti V
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1203-1215. PubMed ID: 29565749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exact group-sequential designs for clinical trials with randomized play-the-winner allocation.
    Stallard N; Rosenberger WF
    Stat Med; 2002 Feb; 21(4):467-80. PubMed ID: 11836730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequential monitoring of covariate adaptive randomized clinical trials with sample size re-estimation.
    Yu J; Lai D
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 87():105874. PubMed ID: 31678412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens in a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial with a continuous longitudinal outcome.
    Seewald NJ; Kidwell KM; Nahum-Shani I; Wu T; McKay JR; Almirall D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1891-1912. PubMed ID: 31571526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size: understanding efficient types of adaptation.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Stat Med; 2013 Apr; 32(8):1259-75; discussion 1280-2. PubMed ID: 23081665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.