383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31471862)
1. Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
Cavicchi M; Tharsis G; Burtin P; Cattan P; Venezia F; Tordjman G; Gillet A; Samama J; Nahon-Uzan K; Karsenti D
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Dec; 64(12):3579-3588. PubMed ID: 31471862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Butterly L; Robinson CM; Anderson JC; Weiss JE; Goodrich M; Onega TL; Amos CI; Beach ML
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 109(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 24394752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colorectal adenomatous and serrated polyps in rural South Australia: who, why, what and where?
Watson MM; ; Watson DC; Maddern GJ; Wichmann MW
ANZ J Surg; 2023 Dec; 93(12):2939-2945. PubMed ID: 37684707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.
Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist.
Sanaka MR; Gohel T; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Church JM; Burke CA
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25101608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated polyp detection in the colorectum: a prospective study (with videos).
Klare P; Sander C; Prinzen M; Haller B; Nowack S; Abdelhafez M; Poszler A; Brown H; Wilhelm D; Schmid RM; von Delius S; Wittenberg T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):576-582.e1. PubMed ID: 30342029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks.
Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship of colonoscopy-detected serrated polyps with synchronous advanced neoplasia in average-risk individuals.
Álvarez C; Andreu M; Castells A; Quintero E; Bujanda L; Cubiella J; Salas D; Lanas Á; Carballo F; Morillas JD; Hernández C; Jover R; Sarasqueta C; Enriquéz-Navascués JM; Hernández V; Estévez P; Macenlle R; Sala T; Balaguer F; Pellisé M; Moreira L; Gil I; Peris A; González-Rubio F; Ferrández A; Poves C; Ponce M; Grau J; Serradesanferm A; Ono A; Cruzado J; Pérez-Riquelme F; Alonso-Abreu I; Carrillo-Palau M; Santander C; Díaz Tasende J; Herreros A; Cacho G; Barranco LE; Bessa X;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Aug; 78(2):333-341.e1. PubMed ID: 23623039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Panchromoendoscopy Increases Detection of Polyps in Patients With Serrated Polyposis Syndrome.
López-Vicente J; Rodríguez-Alcalde D; Hernández L; Riu Pons F; Vega P; Herrero Rivas JM; Santiago García J; Salces Franco I; Bustamante Balén M; López-Cerón M; Pellisé M;
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2016-2023.e6. PubMed ID: 30366156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.
Maratt JK; Dickens J; Schoenfeld PS; Elta GH; Jackson K; Rizk D; Erickson C; Menees SB
Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Dec; 62(12):3579-3585. PubMed ID: 29043592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variation Over Time and Factors Associated With Detection Rates of Sessile Serrated Lesion Across the United States: Results Form a National Sample Using the GIQuIC Registry.
Shaukat A; Holub J; Greenwald D; Eisen G; Schmitt C
Am J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jan; 116(1):95-99. PubMed ID: 32833735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).
Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of time of day and specialty on polyp detection rates in Australia.
Zorron Cheng Tao Pu L; Lu K; Ovenden A; Rana K; Singh G; Krishnamurthi S; Edwards S; Wilson B; Nakamura M; Yamamura T; Ruszkiewicz A; Hirooka Y; Burt AD; Singh R
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 34(5):899-906. PubMed ID: 30552716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
