These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31472130)

  • 1. Durability of Mitral Valve Bioprostheses: A Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Follow-up Studies.
    Malvindi PG; Mastro F; Kowalewski M; Ringold M; Margari V; Suwalski P; Speziale G; Paparella D
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Feb; 109(2):603-611. PubMed ID: 31472130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses.
    Eric Jamieson WR; Marchand MA; Pelletier CL; Norton R; Pellerin M; Dubiel TW; Aupart MR; Daenen WJ; Holden MP; David TE; Ryba EA; Anderson WN
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 118(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 10425003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-Term Outcomes of Mosaic Versus Perimount Mitral Replacements: 17-Year Follow-Up of 940 Implants.
    Beute TJ; Goehler M; Parker J; Boeve T; Heiser J; Murphy E; Timek T; Willekes CL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 110(2):508-515. PubMed ID: 31866480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized, prospective assessment of bioprosthetic valve durability. Hancock versus Carpentier-Edwards valves.
    Sarris GE; Robbins RC; Miller DC; Mitchell RS; Moore KA; Stinson EB; Oyer PE; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
    Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 2):II55-64. PubMed ID: 8222197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to seventeen years.
    Jamieson WR; Munro AI; Miyagishima RT; Allen P; Burr LH; Tyers GF
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Oct; 60(4):999-1006; discussion 1007. PubMed ID: 7575007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
    Jamieson WR; Gudas VM; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Fradet GJ; Ling H; Germann E; Lichtenstein SV
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Pericardial Bioprosthesis in Chinese Patients with Single or Multiple Valve Replacement in Aortic, Mitral, or Tricuspid Positions.
    Guo H; Lu C; Huang H; Xie B; Liu J; Zheng S; Fan R; Chen J; Zhuang J
    Cardiology; 2017; 138(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 28618423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
    Fann JI; Miller DC
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-Term Outcomes of Bioprosthetic Valves in the Mitral Position: A Pooled Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Individual Patient Data.
    Koulouroudias M; Di Mauro M; Chiariello G; Meani P; Lorusso R
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Jun; 221():64-73. PubMed ID: 38636624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic or mitral position: a 12-year experience.
    Neville PH; Aupart MR; Diemont FF; Sirinelli AL; Lemoine EM; Marchand MA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6 Suppl):S143-7. PubMed ID: 9930436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparable long-term results for porcine and pericardial prostheses after isolated aortic valve replacement.
    Andreas M; Wallner S; Ruetzler K; Wiedemann D; Ehrlich M; Heinze G; Binder T; Moritz A; Hiesmayr MJ; Kocher A; Laufer G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Oct; 48(4):557-61. PubMed ID: 25527170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term durability of the Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis.
    Rizzoli G; Bottio T; Thiene G; Toscano G; Casarotto D
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Jul; 126(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 12878940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients.
    Nielsen PH; Hjortdal V; Modrau IS; Jensen H; Kimose HH; Terp K; Poulsen SH; Smerup M; Nielsen SL
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1705-10. PubMed ID: 26984983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Wu Y; Wang L; Starr A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 23010581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 10-year comparison of mitral valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Hancock porcine bioprostheses.
    Perier P; Deloche A; Chauvaud S; Chachques JC; Relland J; Fabiani JN; Stephan Y; Blondeau P; Carpentier A
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1989 Jul; 48(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 2764601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprostheses early after implantation.
    Blauwet LA; Malouf JF; Connolly HM; Hodge DO; Evans KN; Herges RM; Sundt TM; Miller FA
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2010 Jun; 23(6):656-66. PubMed ID: 20497863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mosaic bioprosthesis after 5 years].
    Eichinger W; Günzinger R; Botzenhardt F; Simmerl D; Gansera B; Kemkes BM
    Herz; 2000 Nov; 25(7):659-66. PubMed ID: 11141675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations.
    Bourguignon T; Bouquiaux-Stablo AL; Loardi C; Mirza A; Candolfi P; Marchand M; Aupart MR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):2004-2011.e1. PubMed ID: 24667021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.
    Gao G; Wu Y; Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Starr A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
    Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.