These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31472559)

  • 1. Asymmetric temporal envelope encoding: Implications for within- and across-ear envelope comparison.
    Anderson SR; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):1189. PubMed ID: 31472559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymmetric temporal envelope sensitivity: Within- and across-ear envelope comparisons in listeners with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Anderson SR; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3294. PubMed ID: 36586876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal coding of envelopes and their interaural delays in the inferior colliculus of the unanesthetized rabbit.
    Batra R; Kuwada S; Stanford TR
    J Neurophysiol; 1989 Feb; 61(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 2918354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interaural time discrimination of envelopes carried on high-frequency tones as a function of level and interaural carrier mismatch.
    Blanks DA; Buss E; Grose JH; Fitzpatrick DC; Hall JW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):674-83. PubMed ID: 18596646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the Interplay Between Cochlear Gain Loss and Temporal Envelope Coding Deficits.
    Verhulst S; Piktel P; Jagadeesh A; Mauermann M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():467-475. PubMed ID: 27080688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M; Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238125. PubMed ID: 32822439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rate dependent neural responses of interaural-time-difference cues in fine-structure and envelope.
    Hu H; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B; Vickers D
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17104. PubMed ID: 38680894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory cortical response patterns to multiple rhythms of AM sound.
    Draganova R; Ross B; Borgmann C; Pantev C
    Ear Hear; 2002 Jun; 23(3):254-65. PubMed ID: 12072617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: implications for sound localization.
    Dreyer A; Delgutte B
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 96(5):2327-41. PubMed ID: 16807349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Envelope following responses predict speech-in-noise performance in normal-hearing listeners.
    Mepani AM; Verhulst S; Hancock KE; Garrett M; Vasilkov V; Bennett K; de Gruttola V; Liberman MC; Maison SF
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Apr; 125(4):1213-1222. PubMed ID: 33656936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural encoding of spectro-temporal cues at slow and near speech-rate in cochlear implant users.
    Undurraga JA; Van Yper L; Bance M; McAlpine D; Vickers D
    Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108160. PubMed ID: 33461048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.
    Vollmer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(31):6949-6966. PubMed ID: 29959238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of stochastic envelopes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Gomersall PA; Turner RE; Baguley DM; Deeks JM; Gockel HE; Carlyon RP
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():8-24. PubMed ID: 26706708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates.
    Monaghan JJ; Bleeck S; McAlpine D
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural and behavioral sensitivity to interaural time differences using amplitude modulated tones with mismatched carrier frequencies.
    Blanks DA; Roberts JM; Buss E; Hall JW; Fitzpatrick DC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 8(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 17657543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Hu N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural sensitivity to interaural envelope delays in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig.
    Griffin SJ; Bernstein LR; Ingham NJ; McAlpine D
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 93(6):3463-78. PubMed ID: 15703234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.