These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31472729)

  • 1. Population-Based Observational Studies in Oncology: Proceed With Caution.
    Soni PD; Spratt DE
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2019 Oct; 29(4):302-305. PubMed ID: 31472729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative effectiveness research in cancer with observational data.
    Giordano SH
    Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2015; ():e330-5. PubMed ID: 25993193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative effectiveness clinical trials to advance treatment of myasthenia gravis.
    Guptill JT; Raja S; Sanders DB; Narayanaswami P
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Feb; 1413(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29377158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative effectiveness research: opportunities in surgical oncology.
    Neuman HB; Greenberg CC
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24314341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative effectiveness research in oncology methodology: observational data.
    Hershman DL; Wright JD
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4215-22. PubMed ID: 23071228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analytical Methods for Observational Data to Generate Hypotheses and Inform Clinical Decisions.
    DeWees TA; Vargas CE; Golafshar MA; Harmsen WS; Dueck AC
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2019 Oct; 29(4):311-317. PubMed ID: 31472731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving rheumatoid arthritis comparative effectiveness research through causal inference principles: systematic review using a target trial emulation framework.
    Zhao SS; Lyu H; Solomon DH; Yoshida K
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2020 Jul; 79(7):883-890. PubMed ID: 32381560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of comparative effectiveness research: a practical tool.
    Schaumberg DA; McDonald L; Shah S; Stokes M; Nordstrom BL; Ramagopalan SV
    J Comp Eff Res; 2018 May; 7(5):503-515. PubMed ID: 29463115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring cause-and-effect relationships without randomized clinical trials: Quasi-experimental methods for gynecologic oncology research.
    Moss HA; Melamed A; Wright JD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 152(3):533-539. PubMed ID: 30876500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Considerations for observational research using large data sets in radiation oncology.
    Jagsi R; Bekelman JE; Chen A; Chen RC; Hoffman K; Shih YC; Smith BD; Yu JB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Sep; 90(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 25195986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An overview of methods for comparative effectiveness research.
    Meyer AM; Wheeler SB; Weinberger M; Chen RC; Carpenter WR
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24314337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative effectiveness research: moving medical oncology forward.
    Hirsch BR; Zafar SY
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 24314342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian data analysis in observational comparative effectiveness research: rationale and examples.
    Olson WH; Crivera C; Ma YW; Panish J; Mao L; Lynch SM
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Nov; 2(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 24236795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.
    Basch E; Abernethy AP; Mullins CD; Reeve BB; Smith ML; Coons SJ; Sloan J; Wenzel K; Chauhan C; Eppard W; Frank ES; Lipscomb J; Raymond SA; Spencer M; Tunis S
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4249-55. PubMed ID: 23071244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.
    Kirpalani H; Truog WE; D'Angio CT; Cotten M
    Semin Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 40(6):341-347. PubMed ID: 27423511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Instrumental variable analyses for observational comparative effectiveness research: the paired availability design.
    Baker SG; Lindeman KS
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Dec; 161(11):840-1. PubMed ID: 25437417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Instrumental variable analyses for observational comparative effectiveness research: the paired availability design.
    Garabedian LF; Zaslavsky AM; Soumerai SB
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Dec; 161(11):841. PubMed ID: 25437418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approaches to answering critical CER questions.
    Kinnier CV; Chung JW; Bilimoria KY
    Cancer Treat Res; 2015; 164():1-14. PubMed ID: 25677015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodological issues in observational studies and non-randomized controlled trials in oncology in the era of big data.
    Tanaka S; Tanaka S; Kawakami K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 25589456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.