BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31472798)

  • 1. A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.
    Camilleri A; Abarno D; Bird C; Coxon A; Mitchell N; Redman K; Sly N; Wills S; Silenieks E; Simpson E; Lindsay H
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):533-543. PubMed ID: 31472798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 31472796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook.
    Curley LJ; Munro J; Lages M; MacLean R; Murray J
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):354-360. PubMed ID: 31693180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.
    Cooper GS; Meterko V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():35-46. PubMed ID: 30769302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strengthening forensic DNA decision making through a better understanding of the influence of cognitive bias.
    Jeanguenat AM; Budowle B; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):415-420. PubMed ID: 29173454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of contextual information in forensic toxicology: An international survey of toxicologists' experiences.
    Hamnett HJ; Jack RE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Jul; 59(4):380-389. PubMed ID: 31256809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.
    He N; Wang L; Hao H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111232. PubMed ID: 35176676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Needed: consensus and classification for terms used in cognitive, forensic and clinical bias discussions.
    Satya-Murti S; Lockhart JJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Dec; 293():e10-e11. PubMed ID: 30337118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How Cross-Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors' Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence.
    Thompson WC; Scurich N
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1379-1388. PubMed ID: 30791101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Context Effects in Forensic Entomology and Use of Sequential Unmasking in Casework.
    Archer MS; Wallman JF
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Sep; 61(5):1270-7. PubMed ID: 27378533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fit for purpose quality management system for military forensic exploitation.
    Wilson LE; Gahan ME; Robertson J; Lennard C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Mar; 284():136-140. PubMed ID: 29408721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnosing Crime and Diagnosing Disease: Bias Reduction Strategies in the Forensic and Clinical Sciences.
    Lockhart JJ; Satya-Murti S
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Nov; 62(6):1534-1541. PubMed ID: 28230894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Review of Forensic Science Management Literature.
    Houck MM; McAndrew WP; Porter M; Davies B
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2015 Jan; 27(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 26227138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blinding or information control in diagnosis: could it reduce errors in clinical decision-making?
    Lockhart JJ; Satya-Murti S
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2018 Nov; 5(4):179-189. PubMed ID: 30231010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dismantling the justice silos: Flowcharting the role and expertise of forensic science, forensic medicine and allied health in adult sexual assault investigations.
    Kelty SF; Julian R; Bruenisholz E; Wilson-Wilde L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Apr; 285():21-28. PubMed ID: 29427705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do evidence submission forms expose latent print examiners to task-irrelevant information?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Blaisdell KN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():236-242. PubMed ID: 30875663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosing Crime and Diagnosing Disease-II: Visual Pattern Perception and Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Satya-Murti S; Lockhart JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1429-1434. PubMed ID: 29341129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forensic Confirmation Bias: Do Jurors Discount Examiners Who Were Exposed to Task-Irrelevant Information?*
    Kukucka J; Hiley A; Kassin SM
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1978-1990. PubMed ID: 32790911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners.
    Edmond G; Towler A; Growns B; Ribeiro G; Found B; White D; Ballantyne K; Searston RA; Thompson MB; Tangen JM; Kemp RI; Martire K
    Sci Justice; 2017 Mar; 57(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 28284440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive neuroscience in forensic science: understanding and utilizing the human element.
    Dror IE
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.