These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31472798)

  • 21. Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners.
    Edmond G; Towler A; Growns B; Ribeiro G; Found B; White D; Ballantyne K; Searston RA; Thompson MB; Tangen JM; Kemp RI; Martire K
    Sci Justice; 2017 Mar; 57(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 28284440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A cultural change to enable improved decision-making in forensic science: A six phased approach.
    Earwaker H; Nakhaeizadeh S; Smit NM; Morgan RM
    Sci Justice; 2020 Jan; 60(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 31924294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reducing the impact of cognitive bias in decision making: Practical actions for forensic science practitioners.
    Kunkler KS; Roy T
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2023; 7():100341. PubMed ID: 37409239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A review of quality procedures in the UK forensic sciences: What can the field of digital forensics learn?
    Page H; Horsman G; Sarna A; Foster J
    Sci Justice; 2019 Jan; 59(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 30654972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Human Factors Effecting Forensic Decision Making: Workplace Stress and Well-being.
    Jeanguenat AM; Dror IE
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):258-261. PubMed ID: 28464220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement.
    Budowle B; Bottrell MC; Bunch SG; Fram R; Harrison D; Meagher S; Oien CT; Peterson PE; Seiger DP; Smith MB; Smrz MA; Soltis GL; Stacey RB
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):798-809. PubMed ID: 19486241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What soda challenges and tennis balls can teach us about cognitive bias.
    Delger D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():e23-e24. PubMed ID: 30529055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Forensic Confirmation Bias: A Comparison Between Experts and Novices.
    van den Eeden CAJ; de Poot CJ; van Koppen PJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):120-126. PubMed ID: 29772072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital transformation risk management in forensic science laboratories.
    Casey E; Souvignet TR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110486. PubMed ID: 32919163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contextual bias in forensic toxicology decisions: A follow-up empirical study from China.
    He N; Hao H
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jul; 69(4):1400-1406. PubMed ID: 38567838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cognitive neuroscience in forensic science: understanding and utilizing the human element.
    Dror IE
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias.
    Nakhaeizadeh S; Dror IE; Morgan RM
    Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 24796950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Integrating research into operational practice.
    Ross A
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Letter to the Editor- Context Management Toolbox: A Linear Sequential Unmasking (LSU) Approach for Minimizing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decision Making.
    Dror IE; Thompson WC; Meissner CA; Kornfield I; Krane D; Saks M; Risinger M
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):1111-2. PubMed ID: 26088016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality of Laypersons' Assessment of Forensically Relevant Stimuli.
    Sneyd D; Schreiber Compo N; Rivard J; Pena M; Stoiloff S; Hernandez G
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1507-1516. PubMed ID: 32628285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Forensic case coordination in Europe - Their role within 5 European institutes.
    Bitzer S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():1-5. PubMed ID: 31063882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cascading Bias of Initial Exposure to Information at the Crime Scene to the Subsequent Evaluation of Skeletal Remains.
    Nakhaeizadeh S; Morgan RM; Rando C; Dror IE
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):403-411. PubMed ID: 28678377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The balanced scorecard: sustainable performance assessment for forensic laboratories.
    Houck M; Speaker PJ; Fleming AS; Riley RA
    Sci Justice; 2012 Dec; 52(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 23068771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions.
    Dror I; Melinek J; Arden JL; Kukucka J; Hawkins S; Carter J; Atherton DS
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1751-1757. PubMed ID: 33608908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Concepts and possibilities in forensic intelligence.
    Bell C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Oct; 162(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16893621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.