These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31472800)

  • 1. Two-dimensional linear analysis of dynamic bare footprints: A comparison of measurement techniques.
    Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):552-557. PubMed ID: 31472800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-dimensional metric comparisons between dynamic bare footprints and insole foot impressions-forensic implications.
    Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 32111287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-dimensional metric comparison between dynamic bare and sock-clad footprints for its forensic implications - A pilot study.
    Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    Sci Justice; 2019 Jan; 59(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 30654967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of the Podotrack in forensic podiatry for collection and analysis of bare footprints using the Reel method of measurement.
    Burrow JG
    Sci Justice; 2016 May; 56(3):216-222. PubMed ID: 27162020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the length and width of static inked two-dimensional bare footprints found on a hard compared to a soft surface.
    Curran M; Holmes I
    Sci Justice; 2019 Jul; 59(4):448-451. PubMed ID: 31256817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of a two-dimensional sock-clad footprint linear measurement method.
    Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Reel S
    Sci Justice; 2021 Sep; 61(5):649-656. PubMed ID: 34482945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of static and dynamic bare footprint dimensions in a north Indian population.
    Mukhra R; Krishan K; Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Kanchan T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Mar; 308():110169. PubMed ID: 32004995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of standing fleshed foot and walking and jumping bare footprint measurements.
    Howsam N; Bridgen A
    Sci Justice; 2018 Sep; 58(5):346-354. PubMed ID: 30193660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bare footprint metric analysis methods for comparison and identification in forensic examinations: A review of literature.
    Mukhra R; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2018 Aug; 58():101-112. PubMed ID: 29777981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forensic measurement comparison of foot insole impressions.
    Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Minetola TJ; Esbenson AM; Samuel AL; Campbell J
    Sci Justice; 2024 May; 64(3):264-268. PubMed ID: 38735661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The contact area of static and dynamic footprints: Forensic implications.
    Mukhra R; Krishan K; Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Kanchan T
    Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):187-192. PubMed ID: 33736852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of footprint and its parts for stature estimation in Indian population.
    Kanchan T; Krishan K; ShyamSundar S; Aparna KR; Jaiswal S
    Foot (Edinb); 2012 Sep; 22(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 22456109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating actual foot size from a static bare foot print in a White British Population.
    Curran M; Gillespie L; Melville S; Campbell J; Kagan B
    Sci Justice; 2019 May; 59(3):317-321. PubMed ID: 31054820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An investigation into the cause of the inner dark areas and outer lighter areas (ghosting) seen in dynamically-created two-dimensional bare footprints.
    Obe WV; Simmonite N; Reel S; Reidy S
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jul; 57(4):276-282. PubMed ID: 28606334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emergence of forensic podiatry--A novel sub-discipline of forensic sciences.
    Krishan K; Kanchan T; DiMaggio JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Oct; 255():16-27. PubMed ID: 26163192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The identification and reliability of static and dynamic barefoot impression measurements: A systematic review.
    Hu A; Arnold JB; Causby R; Jones S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():156-164. PubMed ID: 29864603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of a two-dimensional footprint measurement approach.
    Reel S; Rouse S; Vernon W; Doherty P
    Sci Justice; 2010 Sep; 50(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 20709270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of assessing the ghosting phenomenon in dynamic footprints when estimating stature - Forensic implications.
    Švábová P; Hanzelyová K; Chovancová M; Masnicová S; Beňuš R
    Sci Justice; 2024 May; 64(3):322-332. PubMed ID: 38735669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Establishing state of motion through two-dimensional foot and shoe print analysis: A pilot study.
    Neves FB; Arnold GP; Nasir S; Wang W; MacDonald C; Christie I; Abboud RJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Mar; 284():176-183. PubMed ID: 29408727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crime scene reconstruction-Sex prediction from blood stained foot sole impressions.
    Basu N; Bandyopadhyay SK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():156-172. PubMed ID: 28734269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.