These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31473073)

  • 1. [Duration and variation of the ethics approval process in Germany - an example from a non-interventional study with 44 participating centers].
    Eichler M; Schmitt J; Schuler MK
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2019 Oct; 146():15-20. PubMed ID: 31473073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial.
    Stair TO; Reed CR; Radeos MS; Koski G; Camargo CA;
    Acad Emerg Med; 2001 Jun; 8(6):636-41. PubMed ID: 11388939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol.
    Mansbach J; Acholonu U; Clark S; Camargo CA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Apr; 14(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 17312334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trial.
    Seiler CM; Kellmeyer P; Kienle P; Büchler MW; Knaebel HP;
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Feb; 33(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 17264200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Application for academic multicenter studies at German ethical review boards].
    Gökbuget N; Naumann R;
    Onkologie; 2013; 36 Suppl 2():29-35. PubMed ID: 23549034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of multicenter studies by multiple institutional review boards: characteristics and outcomes for perinatal studies implemented by a multicenter network.
    Abramovici A; Salazar A; Edvalson T; Gallagher N; Dorman K; Tita A;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 212(1):110.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25088862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study.
    McWilliams R; Hoover-Fong J; Hamosh A; Beck S; Beaty T; Cutting G
    JAMA; 2003 Jul; 290(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 12865377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study.
    Timmers M; van Dijck JTJM; van Wijk RPJ; Legrand V; van Veen E; Maas AIR; Menon DK; Citerio G; Stocchetti N; Kompanje EJO;
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 May; 21(1):36. PubMed ID: 32398066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time to institutional review board approval with local versus central review in a multicenter pragmatic trial.
    Neuman MD; Gaskins LJ; Ziolek T;
    Clin Trials; 2018 Feb; 15(1):107-111. PubMed ID: 28982261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Institutional review board variability in minimal-risk multicenter urogynecology studies.
    Harvie HS; Lowenstein L; Omotosho TB; Sanses T; Molden S; Hardy J; Brubaker L;
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 22453318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unique challenges of obtaining regulatory approval for a multicenter protocol to study the genetics of RRP and suggested remedies.
    Sherwood ML; Buchinsky FJ; Quigley MR; Donfack J; Choi SS; Conley SF; Derkay CS; Myer CM; Ehrlich GD; Post JC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Aug; 135(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 16890066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transitioning to the National Institutes of Health single institutional review board model: Piloting the use of the Streamlined, Multi-site, Accelerated Resources for Trials IRB Reliance.
    Vardeny O; Hernandez AF; Cohen LW; Franklin A; Baqai M; Palmer S; Bierer BE; Cobb N
    Clin Trials; 2019 Jun; 16(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 30866676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Navigating the institutional review board approval process in a multicenter observational critical care study.
    Polito CC; Cribbs SK; Martin GS; O'Keeffe T; Herr D; Rice TW; Sevransky JE
    Crit Care Med; 2014 May; 42(5):1105-9. PubMed ID: 24368345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Institutional review board barriers and solutions encountered in the Collaboration Among Pharmacists and Physicians to Improve Outcomes Now Study: a national multicenter practice-based implementation trial.
    Maclaughlin EJ; Ardery G; Jackson EA; Ives TJ; Young RB; Fike DS; Carter BL
    Pharmacotherapy; 2013 Sep; 33(9):902-11. PubMed ID: 23649880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Approaches to facilitate institutional review board approval of multicenter research studies.
    Marsolo K
    Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S77-81. PubMed ID: 22692264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How good does the science have to be in proposals submitted to Institutional Review Boards? An interview study of Institutional Review Board personnel.
    Klitzman R
    Clin Trials; 2013 Oct; 10(5):761-6. PubMed ID: 24000378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of clinical trials by Ethics Committees in Germany--results and a comparison of two surveys performed among members of the German Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (vfa).
    Russ H; Busta S; Jost B; Bethke TD
    Ger Med Sci; 2015; 13():Doc02. PubMed ID: 25698912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of local institutional review board review on participation in national practice-based research network studies.
    Finch SA; Barkin SL; Wasserman RC; Dhepyasuwan N; Slora EJ; Sege RD
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Dec; 163(12):1130-4. PubMed ID: 19996050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time required to review research protocols at 10 Veterans Affairs Institutional Review Boards.
    Varley PR; Feske U; Gao S; Stone RA; Zhang S; Monte R; Arnold RM; Hall DE
    J Surg Res; 2016 Aug; 204(2):481-489. PubMed ID: 27565086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.