187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3147314)
1. Artificial feeding and the right to die. The legal issues.
Snyder L
J Leg Med; 1988 Sep; 9(3):349-75. PubMed ID: 3147314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical ethics in the courtroom: the need for scrutiny.
Pellegrino ED; Sharpe VA
Perspect Biol Med; 1989; 32(4):547-64. PubMed ID: 2674888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dying at the right time: a critical legal theory approach to timing-of-death issues.
Ikuta SS
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(1):3-66. PubMed ID: 2695495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to die.
Powell JA; Cohen AS
Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 7960664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Brophy v New England Sinai Hospital, Inc. Brief amicus curiae, Society for the Right to Die, Inc. on behalf of appellant.
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1987 Jul; 35(7):669-78. PubMed ID: 3584770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Precatory prediction and mindless mimicry: the case of Mary O'Connor.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988 Dec; 18(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 3147972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The insane root takes reason prisoner.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 2497081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept?
Robertson ED
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 2621091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The case of Mr. Stevens.
Cranford RE
Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 1938335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legal aspects of withdrawing nourishment.
Horan DJ; Grant ER
J Leg Med; 1984 Dec; 5(4):595-632. PubMed ID: 6394680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The permanently unconscious patient, non-feeding and euthanasia.
Cantor NL
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):381-437. PubMed ID: 2517381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept?
Liacos PJ
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 2621092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.
Sappington GM
J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The living will: does it protect the rights of the terminally ill?
Rizzo RF
N Y State J Med; 1989 Feb; 89(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 2710437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legalistic ethics and the lingering doubt about withdrawing life-supports.
Vaux K
J Allied Health; 1991; 20(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 1761409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Too much ado.
Albert LA
J Leg Med; 1991 Sep; 12(3):331-58. PubMed ID: 1748837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Thunder from California: the Thor decision and the ever-expanding right to die.
Brown LC; Paine SJ
Healthspan; 1993 Oct; 10(9):13-7. PubMed ID: 10183992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Physician-assisted suicide and the right to die with assistance.
Harv Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 105(8):2021-40. PubMed ID: 10119163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Do feeding tubes have more rights than patients?
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 3082798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
