1119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31473884)
21. The potential of a nomogram combined PI-RADS v2.1 and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to reduce unnecessary biopsies in prostate cancer diagnostics.
Liu Y; Wang S; Xiang LH; Xu G; Dong L; Sun Y; Ye B; Zhang Y; Xu H
Br J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 95(1138):20220209. PubMed ID: 35877385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Development and internal validation of PI-RADs v2-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer.
Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhu YC; Huang YXR; Guo Q; Tian Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 16(1):102. PubMed ID: 29859119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. MRI Fusion-Targeted Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and the Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density and Prostate Health Index for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Southeast Asian Men.
Tan TW; Png KS; Lee CH; Yuwono A; Yeow Y; Chong KT; Lee YM; Tan CH; Tan YK
J Endourol; 2017 Nov; 31(11):1111-1116. PubMed ID: 28797178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development and external validation of a novel nomogram to predict prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA <10 ng/ml and PI-RADS v2.1 = 3 lesions.
Hu C; Sun J; Xu Z; Zhang Z; Zhou Q; Xu J; Chen H; Wang C; Ouyang J
Cancer Med; 2023 Feb; 12(3):2560-2571. PubMed ID: 35920264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Combining clinical and MRI data to manage PI-RADS 3 lesions and reduce excessive biopsy.
Yang S; Zhao W; Tan S; Zhang Y; Wei C; Chen T; Shen J
Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Jun; 9(3):1252-1261. PubMed ID: 32676408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of prostate volume estimation on the risk-adapted biopsy decision based on prostate-specific antigen density and magnetic resonance imaging score.
Baudewyns A; Guenzel K; Halinski A; Dariane C; Delavar G; Anract J; Barry Delongchamps N; Jabbour T; Bourgeno HA; Lefebvre Y; Ferriero M; Simone G; Fourcade A; Fournier G; Oderda M; Gontero P; Bernal-Gomez A; Mastrorosa A; Roche JB; Zahr RA; Ploussard G; Fiard G; Rysankova K; Bui AP; Taha F; Windisch O; Benamran D; Vlahopoulos L; Assenmacher G; Roumeguère T; Peltier A; Diamand R
World J Urol; 2024 May; 42(1):322. PubMed ID: 38747982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category.
Morote J; Campistol M; Triquell M; Celma A; Regis L; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Mast R; Santamaria A; Planas J; Trilla E
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Mar; 37():38-44. PubMed ID: 35243388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28.
Yang J; Li J; Xiao L; Zhou M; Fang Z; Cai Y; Tang Y; Hu S
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Sep; 23(1):81. PubMed ID: 37667341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Development and validation of a novel nomogram predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men based on multi-institutional analysis.
Ge Q; Zhang S; Xu H; Zhang J; Fan Z; Li W; Shen D; Xiao J; Wei Z
Cancer Med; 2023 Dec; 12(24):21820-21829. PubMed ID: 38014481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy after Multiparametric Prostate MRI with VERDICT Analysis: The INNOVATE Study.
Singh S; Rogers H; Kanber B; Clemente J; Pye H; Johnston EW; Parry T; Grey A; Dinneen E; Shaw G; Heavey S; Stopka-Farooqui U; Haider A; Freeman A; Giganti F; Atkinson D; Moore CM; Whitaker HC; Alexander DC; Panagiotaki E; Punwani S
Radiology; 2022 Dec; 305(3):623-630. PubMed ID: 35916679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cutoff Values of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 Score in Men With Prostate-specific Antigen Level 4 to 10 ng/mL: Importance of Lesion Location.
Chen Y; Ruan M; Zhou B; Hu X; Wang H; Liu H; Liu J; Song G
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Aug; 19(4):288-295. PubMed ID: 33632569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Development and validation of a nomogram based on biparametric MRI PI-RADS v2.1 and clinical parameters to avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies.
Wang Y; Wang L; Tang X; Zhang Y; Zhang N; Zhi B; Niu X
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Aug; 23(1):106. PubMed ID: 37582697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating the performance of PI-RADS v2 in the non-academic setting.
Jordan EJ; Fiske C; Zagoria RJ; Westphalen AC
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Nov; 42(11):2725-2731. PubMed ID: 28451763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.
Arcot R; Sekar S; Kotamarti S; Krischak M; Michael ZD; Foo WC; Huang J; Polascik TJ; Gupta RT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Aug; 47(8):2917-2927. PubMed ID: 35674785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Values of multiparametric and biparametric MRI in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis.
Feng X; Chen X; Peng P; Zhou H; Hong Y; Zhu C; Lu L; Xie S; Zhang S; Long L
BMC Urol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):40. PubMed ID: 38365673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical and prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings as predictors of general and clinically significant prostate cancer risk: A retrospective single-center study.
Massanova M; Vere R; Robertson S; Crocetto F; Barone B; Dutto L; Ahmad I; Underwood M; Salmond J; Patel A; Celentano G; Bhatt JR
Curr Urol; 2023 Sep; 17(3):147-152. PubMed ID: 37448611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].
Wang YM; Shang JW; Dong L; Liang LH; Zhao RZ; Liang C; Wang SQ; Xia W; Cheng G; Hua LX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 45(11):942-947. PubMed ID: 37968079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. New model of PIRADS and adjusted prostatespecific antigen density of peripheral zone improves the detection rate of initial prostate biopsy: a diagnostic study.
Huang C; Cai ZQ; Qiu F; Pu JX; Xi QL; Wei XD; Wang XM; Zhao XJ; Guo LC; Hou JQ; Huang YH
Asian J Androl; 2023; 25(1):126-131. PubMed ID: 35488668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The use of
Yang J; Tang Y; Zhou C; Zhou M; Li J; Hu S
Prostate; 2023 Apr; 83(5):430-439. PubMed ID: 36544382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
