308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31474140)
1. Cemented humeral stem
Uy M; Wang J; Horner NS; Bedi A; Leroux T; Alolabi B; Khan M
Bone Joint J; 2019 Sep; 101-B(9):1107-1114. PubMed ID: 31474140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of cemented versus press-fit primary humeral stem fixation in the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty.
Salesky MA; Grace TR; Feeley BT; Ma CB; Zhang AL
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 May; 27(5):801-807. PubMed ID: 29548544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term evaluation of humeral stress shielding following reverse shoulder arthroplasty using press-fit fixation compared with cemented fixation.
Denard PJ; Haidamous G; Gobezie R; Romeo AA; Lederman E
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 May; 29(5):906-912. PubMed ID: 31911215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term outcomes of cemented
Werthel JD; Lonjon G; Jo S; Cofield R; Sperling JW; Elhassan BT
Bone Joint J; 2017 May; 99-B(5):666-673. PubMed ID: 28455477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic evaluation of short-stem press-fit total shoulder arthroplasty: short-term follow-up.
Casagrande DJ; Parks DL; Torngren T; Schrumpf MA; Harmsen SM; Norris TR; Kelly JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1163-9. PubMed ID: 26897311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are short press-fit stems comparable to standard-length cemented stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Van de Kleut ML; Yuan X; Athwal GS; Teeter MG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Mar; 31(3):580-590. PubMed ID: 34968694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and radiographic outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty with an anatomic press-fit short stem.
Szerlip BW; Morris BJ; Laughlin MS; Kilian CM; Edwards TB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 29032988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cementless versus cemented glenoid components in conventional total shoulder joint arthroplasty: analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Page RS; Pai V; Eng K; Bain G; Graves S; Lorimer M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(10):1859-1865. PubMed ID: 29752154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing humeral stem fixation in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the cement-within-cement technique.
Gorman RA; Christmas KN; Simon P; Hess AV; Brewley EE; Mighell MA; Frankle MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7S):S9-S16. PubMed ID: 32360178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value comparison of humeral component press-fit and cemented techniques in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Berglund DD; Mijic D; Law TY; Kurowicki J; Rosas S; Levy JC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Mar; 28(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30392933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mid-term radiological results of a cementless short humeral component in anatomical and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Aibinder WR; Bartels DW; Sperling JW; Sanchez-Sotelo J
Bone Joint J; 2019 May; 101-B(5):610-614. PubMed ID: 31039055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Press-fit vs. cemented humeral stem fixation for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.5 years.
Mazaleyrat M; Favard L; Garaud P; Boileau P; Berhouet J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jan; 30(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 32838951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cement-within-cement technique in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Wagner ER; Houdek MT; Hernandez NM; Cofield RH; Sánchez-Sotelo J; Sperling JW
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1448-1453. PubMed ID: 28233712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Humeral Stem Loosening Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Grey B; Rodseth RN; Roche SJ
JBJS Rev; 2018 May; 6(5):e5. PubMed ID: 29762342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic changes and clinical outcomes associated with an adjustable diaphyseal press-fit humeral stem in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Harmsen SM; Norris TR
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Sep; 26(9):1589-1597. PubMed ID: 28395945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term analysis of revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty using cemented long stems.
Werner BS; Abdelkawi AF; Boehm D; Hudek R; Plumhoff P; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Feb; 26(2):273-278. PubMed ID: 27521141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographic changes around humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty.
Raiss P; Edwards TB; Deutsch A; Shah A; Bruckner T; Loew M; Boileau P; Walch G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Apr; 96(7):e54. PubMed ID: 24695931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.
Levy JC; Berglund D; Vakharia R; DeVito P; Tahal DS; Mijc D; Ameri B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Sep; 477(9):2097-2108. PubMed ID: 31107323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mid-term results of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis using a short-stemmed cementless humeral component.
Schnetzke M; Rick S; Raiss P; Walch G; Loew M
Bone Joint J; 2018 May; 100-B(5):603-609. PubMed ID: 29701085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cemented or cementless humeral fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? a systematic review.
Phadnis J; Huang T; Watts A; Krishnan J; Bain GI
Bone Joint J; 2016 Jan; 98-B(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26733517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
