162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31475060)
1. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for surgical treatment of obese women with endometrial cancer: A cost-benefit comparative analysis.
Capozzi VA; Sozzi G; Gambino G; Cianciolo A; Riccò M; Monfardini L; Gaiano M; Chiantera V; Uccella S; Berretta R
Mol Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 11(4):335-342. PubMed ID: 31475060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Obesity on Surgical Treatment for Endometrial Cancer: A Multicenter Study Comparing Laparoscopy vs Open Surgery, with Propensity-Matched Analysis.
Uccella S; Bonzini M; Palomba S; Fanfani F; Ceccaroni M; Seracchioli R; Vizza E; Ferrero A; Roviglione G; Casadio P; Corrado G; Scambia G; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26282516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of obesity on the 30-day morbidity and mortality after surgery for endometrial cancer.
Mahdi H; Jernigan AM; Aljebori Q; Lockhart D; Moslemi-Kebria M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 25064420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer: a comprehensive review.
Rabinovich A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):721-7. PubMed ID: 25344420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Yanasoot A; Yolsuriyanwong K; Ruangsin S; Laohawiriyakamol S; Sunpaweravong S
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2017; 25(7-8):513-517. PubMed ID: 28871799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Post robotic investment: Cost consequences and impact on length of stay for obese women with endometrial cancer.
Korsholm M; Gyrd-Hansen D; Mogensen O; Möller S; Joergensen SL; Jensen PT
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Oct; 100(10):1830-1839. PubMed ID: 34322867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.
Herling SF
Dan Med J; 2016 Jul; 63(7):. PubMed ID: 27399986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive secondary cytoreduction plus HIPEC versus open surgery plus HIPEC in isolated relapse from ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study on perioperative outcomes.
Fagotti A; Costantini B; Gallotta V; Cianci S; Ronsini C; Petrillo M; Pacciani M; Scambia G; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):428-32. PubMed ID: 25461683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost and quality-of-life analyses of surgery for early endometrial cancer: laparotomy versus laparoscopy.
Spirtos NM; Schlaerth JB; Gross GM; Spirtos TW; Schlaerth AC; Ballon SC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jun; 174(6):1795-9; discussion 1799-800. PubMed ID: 8678142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-benefit analysis of laparoscopic surgery versus laparotomy for patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: experience from an institute in China.
Lu Z; Yi X; Feng W; Ding J; Xu H; Zhou X; Hua K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jul; 38(7):1011-7. PubMed ID: 22487546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer].
He H; Yang Z; Zhang J; Yao D; Fan J; Zhao R; Zeng D; Hu X; Lin Z; Jiang Y; Li L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):902-9. PubMed ID: 26887873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of minimally invasive versus open surgery in the treatment of endometrial carcinosarcoma.
Pedra Nobre S; Mueller JJ; Gardner GJ; Long Roche K; Brown CL; Soslow RA; Alektiar KM; Sonoda Y; Broach VA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Chi DS; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1162-1168. PubMed ID: 32690592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]