143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31475742)
1. Computer-aided sperm analysis, the new key player in routine sperm assessment.
Schubert B; Badiou M; Force A
Andrologia; 2019 Nov; 51(10):e13417. PubMed ID: 31475742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Manual vs. computer-assisted sperm analysis: can CASA replace manual assessment of human semen in clinical practice?
Talarczyk-Desole J; Berger A; Taszarek-Hauke G; Hauke J; Pawelczyk L; Jedrzejczak P
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 28326513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment.
Lammers J; Splingart C; Barrière P; Jean M; Fréour T
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Jan; 31(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 24242989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated semen analysis by SQA Vision
Engel KM; Grunewald S; Schiller J; Paasch U
Andrologia; 2019 Feb; 51(1):e13149. PubMed ID: 30255510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms.
Tomlinson MJ; Pooley K; Simpson T; Newton T; Hopkisson J; Jayaprakasan K; Jayaprakasan R; Naeem A; Pridmore T
Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1911-20. PubMed ID: 19200972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Manual versus computer-automated semen analysis.
Köse M; Sokmensuer LK; Demir A; Bozdag G; Gunalp S
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2014; 41(6):662-4. PubMed ID: 25551959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two automated sperm analyzers using 2 different detection methods versus manual semen assessment.
Lammers J; Chtourou S; Reignier A; Loubersac S; Barrière P; Fréour T
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 50(8):102084. PubMed ID: 33545411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the sperm motility analyzer system (SMAS) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
Akashi T; Watanabe A; Komiya A; Fuse H
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2010 Dec; 56(6):473-7. PubMed ID: 20662592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer.
Agarwal A; Sharma RK
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 17081526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer.
Park MJ; Lim MY; Park HJ; Park NC
Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Nov; 62(6):672-680. PubMed ID: 34729967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a smartphone-based, computer-assisted sperm analysis system compared with laboratory-based manual microscopic semen analysis and computer-assisted semen analysis.
Cheon WH; Park HJ; Park MJ; Lim MY; Park JH; Kang BJ; Park NC
Investig Clin Urol; 2019 Sep; 60(5):380-387. PubMed ID: 31501801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [IVOS Ⅱ versus Sperm Class Analyzer in the results of semen analysis].
Zhong HX; Li GG; Xiong F; Chen PL; Wan CY; Yao ZH; Ma ZH; Zeng Y; Sun Q
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2019 Feb; 25(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 32216197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of the parameters obtained by sperm quality analyzer V and computer-aided sperm analysis system].
Ge YF; Wang CH; Shao Y; Yao B; Wu D; Xia XY; Shang XJ; Huang YF
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Oct; 14(10):923-6. PubMed ID: 19157106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective and objective assessment of fish sperm motility: when the technique and technicians matter.
Gallego V; Herranz-Jusdado JG; Rozenfeld C; Pérez L; Asturiano JF
Fish Physiol Biochem; 2018 Dec; 44(6):1457-1467. PubMed ID: 29713849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
Akashi T; Mizuno I; Okumura A; Fuse H
Arch Androl; 2005; 51(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 16214729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of the sperm quality analyzer (SQA-Vp) for porcine semen analysis.
Rodríguez AL; Rijsselaere T; Bijttebier J; Vyt P; Van Soom A; Maes D
Theriogenology; 2011 Mar; 75(5):972-7. PubMed ID: 21144570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation and usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer V equine for equine semen analysis.
Hoogewijs M; De Vliegher S; De Schauwer C; Govaere J; Smits K; Hoflack G; de Kruif A; Van Soom A
Theriogenology; 2011 Jan; 75(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 20965556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staining-free, Automated Sperm Analysis for In Vitro Fertilization Lab Use.
Dai C; Shan G; Jahangiri S; Chen W; Gholamhoseini B; Zhang Z; Moskovtsev S; Librach C; Jarvi K; Sun Y
J Urol; 2022 Dec; 208(6):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 36097845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can the Sperm Class Analyser (SCA) CASA-Mot system for human sperm motility analysis reduce imprecision and operator subjectivity and improve semen analysis?
Dearing C; Jayasena C; Lindsay K
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2021 Jul; 24(3):208-218. PubMed ID: 31056980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standardization and comparability of CASA instruments.
Davis RO; Katz DF
J Androl; 1992; 13(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 1551809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
