172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31476148)
1. Quantitative shear wave elastography for noninvasive assessment of solid pancreatic masses.
Xie J; Liu H; Liu WS; Li JW
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 74(2):179-187. PubMed ID: 31476148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative EUS elastography for discriminating malignant from benign solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, single-center study.
Dawwas MF; Taha H; Leeds JS; Nayar MK; Oppong KW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Nov; 76(5):953-61. PubMed ID: 22854060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of Real-Time Shear Wave Elastography Versus Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging in the Diagnosis of Female Bladder Neck Obstruction.
Qian M; Jiang D; Su C; Wang X; Zhao X; Yang S
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Sep; 38(9):2427-2435. PubMed ID: 30680774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the differentiation of solid pancreatic masses.
Iglesias-Garcia J; Larino-Noia J; Abdulkader I; Forteza J; Dominguez-Munoz JE
Gastroenterology; 2010 Oct; 139(4):1172-80. PubMed ID: 20600020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual touch tissue quantification using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: initial clinical experience with solid breast masses.
Bai M; Du L; Gu J; Li F; Jia X
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Feb; 31(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22298873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in differentiating renal solid masses: a preliminary experience.
Guo LH; Liu BJ; Xu HX; Liu C; Sun LP; Zhang YF; Xu JM; Wu J; Xu XH
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(11):7469-76. PubMed ID: 25550782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shear wave versus strain elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Gürüf A; Öztürk M; Bayrak İK; Polat AV
Turk J Med Sci; 2019 Oct; 49(5):1509-1517. PubMed ID: 31651122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous comparison between strain and shear wave elastography of breast masses for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions by qualitative and quantitative assessments.
Fujioka T; Mori M; Kubota K; Kikuchi Y; Katsuta L; Kasahara M; Oda G; Ishiba T; Nakagawa T; Tateishi U
Breast Cancer; 2019 Nov; 26(6):792-798. PubMed ID: 31175605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography - Virtual touch
Dória MT; Jales RM; Conz L; Derchain SFM; Sarian LOZ
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():74-80. PubMed ID: 30927963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shear-Wave Elastography of Benign versus Malignant Musculoskeletal Soft-Tissue Masses: Comparison with Conventional US and MRI.
Tavare AN; Alfuraih AM; Hensor EMA; Astrinakis E; Gupta H; Robinson P
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):410-417. PubMed ID: 30480491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic value of EUS elastography in differentiation of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis.
Pei Q; Zou X; Zhang X; Chen M; Guo Y; Luo H
Pancreatology; 2012; 12(5):402-8. PubMed ID: 23127527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Lesions: Quantitative Analysis of Elastic Heterogeneity Improves Diagnostic Performance.
Huang Y; Li F; Han J; Peng C; Li Q; Cao L; Liu Y; Zhou J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1909-1917. PubMed ID: 31130413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. First experience of comparisons between two different shear wave speed imaging systems in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.
He YP; Xu HX; Wang D; Li XL; Ren WW; Zhao CK; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Yue WW
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 65(4):349-361. PubMed ID: 27983544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Performance of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) Combined with Shear-Wave Elastography in Evaluating Breast Lesions.
Zhu YC; Zhang Y; Deng SH; Jiang Q
Med Sci Monit; 2018 Aug; 24():5935-5942. PubMed ID: 30145602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EUS elastography for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis.
Mei M; Ni J; Liu D; Jin P; Sun L
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):578-89. PubMed ID: 23199646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comb-push ultrasound shear elastography of breast masses: initial results show promise.
Denis M; Mehrmohammadi M; Song P; Meixner DD; Fazzio RT; Pruthi S; Whaley DH; Chen S; Fatemi M; Alizad A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119398. PubMed ID: 25774978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
