BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31476376)

  • 1. Half of systematic reviews about pain registered in PROSPERO were not published and the majority had inaccurate status.
    Runjic E; Rombey T; Pieper D; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 116():114-121. PubMed ID: 31476376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting.
    Page MJ; Shamseer L; Tricco AC
    Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 7(1):32. PubMed ID: 29463298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics, completion and publication of PROSPERO records in regional anesthesia for acute perioperative pain.
    Carev M; Čivljak M; Puljak L; Došenović S
    J Comp Eff Res; 2023 Mar; 12(3):e220129. PubMed ID: 36688587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. More systematic reviews were registered in PROSPERO each year, but few records' status was up-to-date.
    Rombey T; Doni K; Hoffmann F; Pieper D; Allers K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():60-67. PubMed ID: 31589953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols.
    van der Braak K; Ghannad M; Orelio C; Heus P; Damen JAA; Spijker R; Robinson K; Lund H; Hooft L
    Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):191. PubMed ID: 36064610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The fate of urological systematic reviews registered in PROSPERO.
    Khaleel S; Cleveland B; Kalapara A; Sathianathen N; Balaji P; Dahm P
    World J Urol; 2020 Nov; 38(11):2981-2986. PubMed ID: 31784773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto H; Tsujimoto Y; Kataoka Y
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Dec; 10(1):703. PubMed ID: 29208054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017.
    Rombey T; Allers K; Mathes T; Hoffmann F; Pieper D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 30866832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers.
    Tawfik GM; Giang HTN; Ghozy S; Altibi AM; Kandil H; Le HH; Eid PS; Radwan I; Makram OM; Hien TTT; Sherif M; Hossain AS; Thang TLL; Puljak L; Salem H; Numair T; Moji K; Huy NT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):213. PubMed ID: 32842968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical significance did not affect time to publication in non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a metaepidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto Y; Tsutsumi Y; Kataoka Y; Tsujimoto H; Yamamoto Y; Papola D; Guyatt GH; Fukuhara S; Furukawa TA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():25-34. PubMed ID: 31276781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication of reviews synthesizing child health evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to identify factors associated with publication in Cochrane and non-Cochrane sources.
    Hartling L; Shave K; Thomson D; Fernandes RM; Wingert A; Williams K
    Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; 5(1):104. PubMed ID: 27328935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer-reviewed articles: an international survey.
    Rombey T; Puljak L; Allers K; Ruano J; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():9-17. PubMed ID: 32201257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inconsistencies in study eligibility criteria are common between non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their protocols registered in PROSPERO.
    Hu K; Zhao L; Zhou Q; Mei F; Gao Q; Chen F; Jiang M; Zhao B; Zhang W; Kwong JSW; Ma Y; Mou C; Ma B
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):394-405. PubMed ID: 33522101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older search.
    Allers K; Hoffmann F; Mathes T; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():102-110. PubMed ID: 29258907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of registered and published systematic reviews focusing on the prevention of COVID-19: a meta-research study.
    Nothacker J; Stadelmaier J; Siemens W; Meerpohl JJ; Schmucker C
    BMJ Open; 2022 May; 12(5):e060255. PubMed ID: 35534064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of information sources used in Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews: A case study in the field of anesthesiology and pain.
    Biocic M; Fidahic M; Cikes K; Puljak L
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):597-605. PubMed ID: 31393677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three out of four published systematic reviews on COVID-19 treatments were not registered and one-third of those registered were published: a meta-research study.
    Siemens W; Nothacker J; Stadelmaier J; Meerpohl JJ; Schmucker C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 152():36-46. PubMed ID: 36179937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reasons and factors associated with inconclusiveness of systematic reviews about interventions for neuropathic pain.
    Dosenovic S; Dujmic A; Nujic D; Vuka I; Tintor G; Kadic AJ; Puljak L
    J Comp Eff Res; 2021 Jan; 10(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 33355481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their published protocols: differences occurred frequently but were seldom explained.
    Koensgen N; Rombey T; Allers K; Mathes T; Hoffmann F; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 110():34-41. PubMed ID: 30822507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.