223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31476612)
1. Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks.
Kristjánsson T; Thornton IM; Chetverikov A; Kristjánsson Á
Cognition; 2020 Jan; 194():104032. PubMed ID: 31476612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
Wolfe JM; Aizenman AM; Boettcher SE; Cain MS
Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():50-9. PubMed ID: 26731644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual foraging and executive functions: A developmental perspective.
Ólafsdóttir IM; Gestsdóttir S; Kristjánsson Á
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():203-213. PubMed ID: 30660998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamics of Feature-based Attentional Selection during Color-Shape Conjunction Search.
Lee J; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ; Geng JJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1773-1787. PubMed ID: 30063176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The control of attentional target selection in a colour/colour conjunction task.
Berggren N; Eimer M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2383-2396. PubMed ID: 27357843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
Reimer CB; Schubert T
Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.
Wiegand I; Seidel C; Wolfe J
Psychol Aging; 2019 Sep; 34(6):805-820. PubMed ID: 31414857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
Kerzel D; Witzel C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Foraging with Anne Treisman: Features versus conjunctions, patch leaving and memory for foraged locations.
Kristjánsson Á; Björnsson AS; Kristjánsson T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):818-831. PubMed ID: 31898061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.
Inukai T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):939-50. PubMed ID: 20436191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context.
Yu X; Geng JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):336-353. PubMed ID: 30742475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attentional Access to Multiple Target Objects in Visual Search.
Berggren N; Eimer M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 32(2):283-300. PubMed ID: 31560272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contingent capture is weakened in search for multiple features from different dimensions.
Biderman D; Biderman N; Zivony A; Lamy D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1974-1992. PubMed ID: 28425733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual search and foraging compared in a large-scale search task.
Smith AD; Hood BM; Gilchrist ID
Cogn Process; 2008 May; 9(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 18188627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Age differences in foraging and executive functions: A cross-sectional study.
Ólafsdóttir IM; Gestsdóttir S; Kristjánsson Á
J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Oct; 198():104910. PubMed ID: 32622069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contingent attentional capture across multiple feature dimensions in a temporal search task.
Ito M; Kawahara JI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():107-13. PubMed ID: 26637932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
