293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31477431)
1. Economics of Multicomponent Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Community Guide Systematic Review.
Mohan G; Chattopadhyay SK; Ekwueme DU; Sabatino SA; Okasako-Schmucker DL; Peng Y; Mercer SL; Thota AB;
Am J Prev Med; 2019 Oct; 57(4):557-567. PubMed ID: 31477431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of Leveraging Social Determinants of Health to Improve Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
Mohan G; Chattopadhyay S
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1434-1444. PubMed ID: 32556187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Engaging Community Health Workers to Increase Cancer Screening: A Community Guide Systematic Economic Review.
Attipoe-Dorcoo S; Chattopadhyay SK; Verughese J; Ekwueme DU; Sabatino SA; Peng Y;
Am J Prev Med; 2021 Apr; 60(4):e189-e197. PubMed ID: 33309455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
Hristova L; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Priority setting in scaled-up cancer screening in China: an systematic review of economic evaluation evidences].
Shi JF; Mao AY; Bai YN; Liu GX; Liu CC; Wang H; Cao MM; Feng H; Wang L; Bai FZ; Huang HY; Bai HJ; Zhu J; Yan XX; Zhang J; Ren JS; Li N; Dai M; Chen WQ
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 54(3):306-313. PubMed ID: 32187937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to increase cervical screening uptake at first invitation (STRATEGIC).
Tsiachristas A; Gittins M; Kitchener H; Gray A
J Med Screen; 2018 Jun; 25(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 28530515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-Effectiveness of Cancer Screening: Health and Costs in Life Years Gained.
Ratushnyak S; Hoogendoorn M; van Baal PHM
Am J Prev Med; 2019 Dec; 57(6):792-799. PubMed ID: 31753260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost effectiveness of strategies to combat breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: mathematical modelling study.
Ginsberg GM; Lauer JA; Zelle S; Baeten S; Baltussen R
BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e614. PubMed ID: 22389347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Targeted, Personalized Risk Information to Increase Appropriate Screening by First-Degree Relatives of People With Colorectal Cancer.
Reeves P; Doran C; Carey M; Cameron E; Sanson-Fisher R; Macrae F; Hill D
Health Educ Behav; 2019 Oct; 46(5):798-808. PubMed ID: 30857431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Inefficiencies and High-Value Improvements in U.S. Cervical Cancer Screening Practice: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Kim JJ; Campos NG; Sy S; Burger EA; Cuzick J; Castle PE; Hunt WC; Waxman A; Wheeler CM;
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Oct; 163(8):589-97. PubMed ID: 26414147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-Effectiveness of Current Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests.
Ladabaum U
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2020 Jul; 30(3):479-497. PubMed ID: 32439083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Economic Evaluation of Web- versus Telephone-based Interventions to Simultaneously Increase Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screening Among Women.
Huang D; Lairson DR; Chung TH; Monahan PO; Rawl SM; Champion VL
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2021 Sep; 14(9):905-916. PubMed ID: 34244154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies-A Systematic Review.
Ran T; Cheng CY; Misselwitz B; Brenner H; Ubels J; Schlander M
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):1969-1981.e15. PubMed ID: 30659991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates.
Lew JB; Feletto E; Wade S; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Nickson C; Simms KT; Procopio P; Taylor N; Worthington J; Smith D; Canfell K
Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Economic value of home-based, multi-trigger, multicomponent interventions with an environmental focus for reducing asthma morbidity a community guide systematic review.
Nurmagambetov TA; Barnett SB; Jacob V; Chattopadhyay SK; Hopkins DP; Crocker DD; Dumitru GG; Kinyota S;
Am J Prev Med; 2011 Aug; 41(2 Suppl 1):S33-47. PubMed ID: 21767734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of anal cancer screening in women with cervical neoplasia in British Columbia, Canada.
Cromwell I; Gaudet M; Peacock SJ; Aquino-Parsons C
BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Jun; 16():206. PubMed ID: 27349646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare.
Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A; Brill JV; Levin Z; Bundorf KM
Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Dec; 113(12):1836-1847. PubMed ID: 29904156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
